Is Classical Velocity Potential a Quantum Mechanical Wavefunction?


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


Quantum mechanics is a theoretical formalism that is completely different from classical particle kinematics (classical mechanics). In general, classical kinematics is identified as a macroscopically approximate formalism of quantum mechanics. In this paper, however, we attempt to seek the origin of quantum mechanical wavefunction in classical mechanics. In our prescription, a classical velocity potential can be introduced for a moving particle, i.e., since the curl of a classical particle velocity vanishes, the classical momentum can be expressed as a gradient of a certain function (related to the so-called classical velocity potential). It can be found that this velocity potential can serve as a quantum mechanical wavefunction. A classical particle is always accompanied by such a velocity potential. Such a prescription will be employed to three cases: two-particle direct product state, single-particle superposition state, and entangled states (superposition of direct product states). We show that the classical particle momentum can also be in a state of superposition with the wavefunction as its weight coefficients.
Copyright © 2015 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Classical Velocity Potential; Quantum Mechanical Wavefunction; Path Integral; Coupled Schrödinger Fields; Low-Energy Effective Interaction

Full Text:

PDF


References


P. R. Holland: The Quantum Theory of Motion: An Account of the de Broglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge Universeity Press, Cambridge, 1993)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511622687

H. Y. Fan and X. B. Tang: Mathematical Fundamental Progress in Quantum Mechanics (Sci-Tech University Press of China, Hefei 2008), pp. 306-311

X. C. Gao, J. B. Xu, and T. Z. Qian: Phys. Rev. A Vol. 44 (1991), p. 7016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.44.7016

J. Q. Shen, H. Y. Zhu, and P. Chen: Eur. Phys. J. D Vol. 23 (2003), p. 305

N. G. Ni and S. Q. Chen: Advanced Mechanics, 2nd Ed. (Fudan University Press, Shanghai, 2004), pp. 374-378

H. Feshbach and F. Villars: Rev. Mod. Phys. Vol. 30 (1958), p. 24
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.30.24

J. Q. Shen: J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 (2009), 155401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/15/155401

Z. M. Zhang: Quantum Optics (Science Press of China, Beijing 2015), pp. 234-238

J. Y. Zeng: Textbook of Quantum Mechanics (Science Press of China, Beijing, 2003), Chap. 10, pp. 177-196

Y. B. Dai: Gauge Theories of Interactions, 2nd Ed. (Science Press of China, Beijing, 2005), Chap. 9, pp. 322-385

X. C. Gao: Chin. Phys. Lett. Vol. 19 (2002), p. 613

Y. D. Zhang: Advanced Quantum Mechanics (I) (Science Press of China, Beijing, 2009), Chap. 5, pp. 175-218

H. Y. Fan and L. Y. Hu, Optical Transformation: From Quantum to Classical (Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, Shanghai, China, 2010), Chap. 12, pp. 351-355

J. Q. Yao, H. B. Wu, and H. Wang: Acta Sin. Quantum Opt. Vol. 9 (2003), p.121

H. Z. Li: Global Properties of Simple Physical Systems: Berry Phases and Beyond (Shanghai Sci-Tech Press, Shanghai, 1998)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize