Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Multi-Innovation Iterative Identification Algorithms for CARMA Tumor Models


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v16i2.23270

Abstract


Since system identification plays a crucial role in controlling systems, it is essential to have access to appropriate identification methods. In this paper, two novel identification methods are proposed for estimating Controlled Auto-Regressive Moving Average (CARMA) systems: the multi-innovation gradient-based iterative algorithm and the two-stage multi-innovation gradient-based iterative algorithm. Our primary objective is to estimate the unknown parameters of a tumor model using these methods. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methods, various factors are considered, such as convergence rate and estimation error. By conducting simulations, the practical applicability and performance of the introduced algorithms are demonstrated. The obtained results are presented through tables and figures, providing a comprehensive analysis of the estimation outcomes. The multi-innovation gradient-based iterative algorithm and the two-stage multi-innovation gradient-based iterative algorithm offer valuable contributions to the field of system identification, particularly in the context of CARMA systems. These methods offer an innovative approach to estimate the parameters of complex systems, specifically focusing on tumor models. The convergence rate and estimation error analysis highlight the reliability and accuracy of the proposed methods, indicating their potential for practical implementation. In conclusion, this paper presents novel identification methods for estimating CARMA systems in the context of tumor models. The proposed algorithms demonstrate promising results in terms of convergence rate and estimation accuracy. These findings contribute to the development of effective and reliable identification techniques, offering valuable insights for controlling and understanding complex systems.
Copyright © 2023 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Multi Innovation Gradient-Based Iterative Method; 2-Stage Identification; System Identification; Parameter Estimation; Practical Tumor Model

Full Text:

PDF


References


I. S. Pace and S. Barnett, Comparison of numerical methods for solving Liapunov matrix equations, Int J Control, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 907-915, 1972.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207177208932205

B. Ayyub and R. McCuen, Numerical methods for engineers. 1995. Accessed: May 23, 2023. [Online]. Available:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/210849

D. A. Bykov and L. L. Doskolovich, Numerical Methods for Calculating Poles of the Scattering Matrix With Applications in Grating Theory, in Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 793-801, March1, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2012.2234723

Mehdi Dehghan, Masoud Hajarian, Matrix equations over (R,S)-symmetric and (R,S)-skew symmetric matrices, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Volume 59, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3583-3594, ISSN 0898-1221.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.03.052

Mehdi Dehghan, Masoud Hajarian, An iterative algorithm for solving a pair of matrix equations AYB=E,CYD=F over generalized centro-symmetric matrices, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Volume 56, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 3246-3260, ISSN 0898-1221.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2008.07.031

Y. Shi, H. Fang, and M. Yan, Kalman filter-based adaptive control for networked systems with unknown parameters and randomly missing outputs, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 1976-1992, Dec. 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.1390

B. Yu, Y. Shi, and H. Huang, l2-l∞ filtering for multirate systems based on lifted models, Circuits Syst Signal Process, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 699-711, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-008-9058-3

H. Fang, J. Wu, and Y. Shi, Genetic adaptive state estimation with missing input/output data, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 224, no. 5, pp. 611-617, Aug. 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1243/09596518JSCE888

Xu L. The parameter estimation algorithms based on the dynamical response measurement data. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2017;9(11).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017730003

Ling Xu, Feng Ding, Ya Gu, Ahmed Alsaedi, Tasawar Hayat, A multi-innovation state and parameter estimation algorithm for a state space system with d-step state-delay, Signal Processing, Volume 140, 2017, Pages 97-103, ISSN 0165-1684.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.05.006

Dongqing Wang, Guowei Yang, Ruifeng Ding, Gradient-based iterative parameter estimation for Box-Jenkins systems, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Volume 60, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1200-1208, ISSN 0898-1221.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.06.001

Zhengwei Ge, Feng Ding, Ling Xu, Ahmed Alsaedi, Tasawar Hayat, Gradient-based iterative identification method for multivariate equation-error autoregressive moving average systems using the decomposition technique, Journal of the Franklin Institute, Volume 356, Issue 3, 2019, Pages 1658-1676, ISSN 0016-0032.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.12.002

Larsson, E. K., Mossberg, M., & Söderström, T. (2004). Practical aspects of continuous-time ARMA system identification. Retrieved from:
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-67846

D. -Q. Wang, H. -B. Liu and F. Ding, Highly Efficient Identification Methods for Dual-Rate Hammerstein Systems, in IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1952-1960, Sept. 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2014.2387216

Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja, Naveed Ishtiaq Chaudhary, Two-stage fractional least mean square identification algorithm for parameter estimation of CARMA systems, Signal Processing, Volume 107, 2015, Pages 327-339, ISSN 0165-1684.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.06.015

A. Mehmood, A. Zameer, M. A. Z. Raja, R. Bibi, N. I. Chaudhary, and M. S. Aslam, Nature-inspired heuristic paradigms for parameter estimation of control autoregressive moving average systems, Neural Comput Appl, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 5819-5842, Oct. 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3406-4

Y. Mao, F. Ding, J. Pan, W. Ding and X. Wan, Filtering based least squares parameter estimation algorithms for Hammerstein nonlinear CARMA systems, 2017 American Control Conference (ACC), Seattle, WA, USA, 2017, pp. 574-579.
https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2017.7963014

H. Sung et al., Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries, CA Cancer J Clin, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209-249, May 2021.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

P. R.-U. F. Collection and undefined 2021, Curing Cancer with Nanotherapy Continues to be an Elusive Goal, J Immunological Sci. (2021); 5(2): 36-39.
https://doi.org/10.29245/2578-3009/2021/2.1212

Bhattacharya T, Dutta S, Akter R, Rahman MH, Karthika C, Nagaswarupa HP, Murthy HCA, Fratila O, Brata R, Bungau S. Role of Phytonutrients in Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics Perspective in Curing Breast Cancer. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(8):1176.
https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081176

S.K. Elagan, Saad J. Almalki, M.R. Alharthi, Mohamed S. Mohamed, Mohamed F. El-Badawy, A mathematical model for exchanging waves between cellular DNA and drug molecules and their roles in curing cancer, Results in Physics, Volume 22, 2021, 103868, ISSN 2211-3797.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103868

S. Avanzini et al., A mathematical model of ctDNA shedding predicts tumor detection size, Sci Adv, vol. 6, no. 50, Dec. 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc4308

S. Kumar and A. Atangana, A numerical study of the nonlinear fractional mathematical model of tumor cells in presence of chemotherapeutic treatment, International Journal of Biomathematics, vol. 13, no. 3, Apr. 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524520500217

Prashant Dogra, Joseph D. Butner, Javier Ruiz Ramírez, Yao-li Chuang, Achraf Noureddine, C. Jeffrey Brinker, Vittorio Cristini, Zhihui Wang, A mathematical model to predict nanomedicine pharmacokinetics and tumor delivery, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, Volume 18, 2020, Pages 518-531, ISSN 2001-0370.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.02.014

L. G. De Pillis and A. Radunskaya, A mathematical tumor model with immune resistance and drug therapy: An optimal control approach, Journal of Theoretical Medicine, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 79-100, 2001.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10273660108833067

L.G De Pillis, A Radunskaya, The dynamics of an optimally controlled tumor model: A case study, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Volume 37, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1221-1244, ISSN 0895-7177.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(03)00133-X

L.G. de Pillis, W. Gu, K.R. Fister, T. Head, K. Maples, A. Murugan, T. Neal, K. Yoshida, Chemotherapy for tumors: An analysis of the dynamics and a study of quadratic and linear optimal controls, Mathematical Biosciences, Volume 209, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 292-315, ISSN 0025-5564.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2006.05.003


Refbacks



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize