Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes Simulations of the Airflow in a Centrifugal Fan Using OpenFOAM


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v12i4.17802

Abstract


The use of numerical models through computational tools allows studying the inner flow of centrifugal fans; this is a normal practice in engineering and scientific communities. When an experimental work is expensive, numerical methods may be used to obtain necessary data. Computational Fluid Dynamics is the name given to computer simulations that enable the visualization and the inspection of flow phenomena in zones that are not easily accessible or measurable, such as blades of the impeller in a turbomachine. Important progresses have been made in Computational Fluid Dynamics over the years: accurate mathematical equations of numerical models, software with more efficient algorithms, and flexible solver codes that reduce the computational effort through user modifications. OpenFOAM is an open-source software developed in C++ library that offers different advantages over commercial computational tools, for instance, over 80 solver applications that can simulate specific cases in fluid mechanics and thermal sciences and engineering. In order to solve the Navier–Stokes equations for incompressible, and turbulent flows in a centrifugal fan with backward inclined blades, the steady-state MRFSimpleFOAM solver has been used. This study has aimed to simulate the flow behavior in the centrifugal fan and to compare the results of three turbulence models (standard k-(, RNG k-(, and realizable k-() with the air flow – pressure curve acquired from experimental measurements using LabVIEW software. A good agreement has been reached between experimental and simulated data. An error rate of 1% between simulated and experimental data has been reached; it is shown that the standard k -epsilon is a semi-empirical model with reasonable accuracy for a wide range of practical applications of flow phenomena.
Copyright © 2019 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Computational Fluid Dynamics; Fan; Model; OpenFOAM; Turbulence

Full Text:

PDF


References


Singh, R., Nataraj, M., Surendar, S., Siva, M., Investigation of a Centrifugal Pump Impeller Vane Profile Using CFD, (2013) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 6 (4), pp. 1327-1333.

Kartashev, A., Martynov, A., Mashkov, O., Numerical and Experimental Studies of a Turbocharger Centrifugal Compressor for Combustion Engine Boost, (2018) International Review of Aerospace Engineering (IREASE), 11 (1), pp. 27-38.
https://doi.org/10.15866/irease.v11i1.13466

Dragan, V., Malael, I., Gherman, B., Development of a Very High Pressure Ratio Single Stage Centrifugal Compressor, (2015) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 8 (3), pp. 347-353.
https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v8i3.6020

S. R. Shah, S. V. Jain, R. N. Patel, and V. J. Lakhera, CFD for centrifugal pumps: a review of the state-of-the-art, Procedia Eng., vol. 51, no. NUiCONE 2012, pp. 715–720, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.102

A. López, W. Nicholls, M. T. Stickland, and W. M. Dempster, CFD study of Jet Impingement Test erosion using Ansys Fluent® and OpenFOAM®, Comput. Phys. Commun., vol. 197, pp. 88–95, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.07.016

T. Mukha, S. Rezaeiravesh, and M. Liefvendahl, A library for wall-modelled large-eddy simulation based on OpenFOAM technology, Comput. Phys. Commun., vol. 239, pp. 204–224, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2019.01.016

J. Cheng, Q. Li, C. Yang, Y. Zhang, and Z. Mao, CFD-PBE simulation of a bubble column in OpenFOAM, Chinese J. Chem. Eng., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1773–1784, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2017.11.012

Bukhtoyarov, V., Tynchenko, V., Petrovskiy, E., Tynchenko, V., Zhukov, V., Improvement of the Methodology for Determining Reliability Indicators of Oil and Gas Equipment, (2018) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 11 (1), pp. 37-50.
https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v11i1.13994

M. Towara, M. Schanen, and U. Naumann, MPI-parallel discrete adjoint OpenFOAM, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.181

T. Capurso et al., Numerical investigation of cavitation on a NACA0015 hydrofoil by means of OpenFOAM, Energy Procedia, vol. 126, pp. 794–801, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.280

H. Zhang and L. Zhang, Numerical simulation of cavitating turbulent flow in a high head Francis turbine at part load operation with OpenFOAM, Procedia Eng., vol. 31, pp. 156–165, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1006

J. Yao, W. Jin, and Y. Song, RANS simulation of the flow around a tanker in forced motion, Ocean Eng., vol. 127, no. October, pp. 236–245, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.003

J. Duarte, E. Avila, L. Lopez, R. Ramirez, and A. Bula, “CFD characterization and optimization of the cavitation phenomenon in dredging centrifugal pumps” pp. 1–35.

Salim, W., Ahmed, S., Prediction of Turbulent Swirling Flow in a Combustor Model, (2016) International Review of Aerospace Engineering (IREASE), 9 (2), pp. 43-50.
https://doi.org/10.15866/irease.v9i2.9562

A. Bayon, D. Valero, R. García-Bartual, F. J. Vallés-Morán, and P. A. López-Jiménez, Performance assessment of OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D in the numerical modeling of a low Reynolds number hydraulic jump, Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 80, pp. 322–335, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.018

J. Vencels, P. Råback, and V. Geža, EOF-Library: Open-source Elmer FEM and OpenFOAM coupler for electromagnetics and fluid dynamics, SoftwareX, vol. 9, pp. 68–72, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2019.01.007

W. Lyu and O. el Moctar, Numerical and experimental investigations of wave-induced second order hydrodynamic loads, Ocean Eng., vol. 131, no. May 2016, pp. 197–212, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.047

Kefalas, P. I., Margaris, D. P., CFD Simulation and Experimental Verification of the Flow Field in a Centrifugal Separator, (2009) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 2(4), pp. 472-178.

T. Capurso, L. Bergamini, and M. Torresi, Design and CFD performance analysis of a novel impeller for double suction centrifugal pumps, Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 341, no. 2019, pp. 155–166, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.11.002

H. L. Liu, Y. Ren, K. Wang, D. H. Wu, W. M. Ru, and M. G. Tan, Research of inner flow in a double blades pump based on openfoam, J. Hydrodyn., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 226–234, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-6058(11)60238-2

L. Mangani, E. Casartelli, and S. Mauri, Assessment of Various Turbulence Models in a High Pressure Ratio Centrifugal Compressor With an Object Oriented CFD Code, J. Turbomach., vol. 134, no. 6, p. 061033, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006310

H. Raach, S. Somasundaram, and J. Mitrovic, Optimisation of turbulence wire spacing in falling films performed with OpenFOAM, Desalination, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 118–119, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.09.012

P. O. Kasyanov, L. Toscano, and N. V. Zadoianchuk, A criterion for the existence of strong solutions for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations, Appl. Math. Lett., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 15–17, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2012.08.007

P. O. Kasyanov, L. Toscano, and N. V. Zadoianchuk, Topological properties of strong solutions for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations, Solid Mech. its Appl., vol. 211, no. February, pp. 181–187, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03146-0_13

A. Buffo, M. Vanni, and D. L. Marchisio, On the implementation of moment transport equations in OpenFOAM: Boundedness and realizability, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, vol. 85, pp. 223–235, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.06.017

H. Jasak, OpenFOAM: Open source CFD in research and industry, Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 89–94, 2009.

M. Tabib, M. S. Siddiqui, A. Rasheed, and T. Kvamsdal, Industrial scale turbine and associated wake development-comparison of RANS based Actuator Line Vs Sliding Mesh Interface Vs Multiple Reference Frame method, Energy Procedia, vol. 137, pp. 487–496, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.377

M. García Pérez and E. Vakkilainen, A comparison of turbulence models and two and three dimensional meshes for unsteady CFD ash deposition tools, Fuel, vol. 237, no. September 2018, pp. 806–811, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.066

Y. Qiu, P. Lu, U. Fischer, P. Pereslavtsev, and S. Kecskes, A generic data translation scheme for the coupling of high-fidelity fusion neutronics and CFD calculations, Fusion Eng. Des., vol. 89, no. 7–8, pp. 1330–1335, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.02.044

L. Sun, W. An, X. Liu, H. Lyu, On developing data-driven turbulence model for DG solution of RANS, Chinese J. Aeronaut., no. April, pp. 1–16, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.04.004

E. Robertson, V. Choudhury, S. Bhushan, and D. K. Walters, Validation of OpenFOAM numerical methods and turbulence models for incompressible bluff body flows, Comput. Fluids, vol. 123, pp. 122–145, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.09.010


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize