Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Safety Management System: a System Dynamics Approach to Manage Risks in a Process Plant


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v9i4.9688

Abstract


The increasing number of accidents caused by the complexity growth of socio-technical systems, the new interactions established among man, machine and environment and the lack of perception of the importance of a continually improved safety culture, have shown the limitations of the traditional Risk Management approach, as it is usually perceived and applied: Risk Management is the set of the processes aimed to identify, assess and group the risks by their priorities. It also includes an economic and coordinated use of resources which, on one hand, seeks to minimize and control the frequency and/or the impact of undesirable events and, on the other hand, to manage the opportunities realization. The continuous evolution of the variables, which characterize the identification, the assessment, the planning and the implementation of corrective measures and control processes, such as the recognition of new risk factors that leads to update their acceptability level, contrasts with their static nature. Therefore, in order to improve the efficiency and the effectiveness of the whole management process, it is necessary, first of all, to adopt a methodology which could solve the previously introduced issues, extending the classical and reactive approach by proposing a new Risk Management vision. It is needed a cyclic structure which could keep the system state under control at any time, by means of tools able to update the evaluation process, if the analyzed factors vary. The final goal is to create a simulation behavioral model of the system that makes it possible to identify the complex network of causal factors that triggers an accidental event with its different scenarios and, consequently, to understand which leverage points can be activated in advance to prevent it: only by means of a full knowledge of the system, it is possible to achieve an effective management of its risk level.
Copyright © 2016 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Risk Management; System Dynamics; Process Plant; Complex Systems; Causal Loop Diagram

Full Text:

PDF


References


P. Plsek, T. Greenhalgh, The challenge of complexity in health care, 2001, BMJ 323, pp. 625–628.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625

T. Reiman et al., Principles of adaptive management in complex safety–critical organizations, 2015, Safety Science 71, pp.80-92.

B. Muniz, J.M. Montes- Peon, C. J. Vazquez- Ordas. Safety management system: development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 20 pagg. 52-68. 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2006.10.002

P. L. Yorio et al., Health and safety management systems through a multilevel and strategic management perspective: Theoretical and empirical considerations, 2015, Safety Science 72, pp. 221–228.

L. S. Robson et al., The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review, 2007, Safety Science 45, pp.329–353.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.003

E. Bottani et al., Safety management systems: Performance differences between adopters and non-adopters, 2009, Safety Science 47, pp. 155-162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.05.001

ISO 31000:2009, Risk management: Principles and guidelines.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14489/hb.supp.2014.07.pp.001-016

F. Khan, S. Abbasi, Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system, 2004, Process Safety Progress 17, pp.157-170.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prs.680170303

Z.H. Quereshi, A review of accident modelling approaches for complex socio-techincal systems, 2007, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twelfth Australian Workshop on Safety Critical Systems and Software and Safety-related Programmable Systems Vol.86.

A. Al-shanini et al, Accident modelling and analysis in process industries, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 32, 2014, p.319-334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.09.016

A. Meel, W.D. Seider, Plant-specific dynamic failure assessment using Bayesian theory, 2006, Chemical Engineering Science 61, pp.7036-7056.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.007

T. Lei, D. Yuanyuan, Simulation study of coal mine safety investment vased on system dynamics, 2014, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 24, pp. 201-205.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.01.010

H. Bouloiz et al., A system dynamics model for behavioral analysis of safety conditions in a chemical storage unit, 2013, Safety Science 58, pp.32-40.

H. Jiang et al., Application of System Dynamics Modeling for the Assessment of Training Performance Effectiveness, 2012, proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 56th annual meeting.

Y. M. Goh et al., Applying systems thinking concepts in the analysis of major incidents and safety culture, 2010, Safety Science 48, pp. 302-309.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.006

J.W. Forrester, Industrial Dynamics, 1961, MIT Press, Cambridge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.135.3502.426-a

C.W. Kirkwood, System Dynamics Method: A Quick Introduction, 2010.

Heinrich et al., Principles of Accident Prevention. Industrial Accident Prevention, 1980, pp.20-29.

A. Hopkins, For whom does safety pay? The case of major accidents, 1999, Safety Science 32, pp.143-153.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(99)00017-x

M. Shin et al., A system dynamics approach for modeling construction workers’safety attitudes and behaviors, 2014, Accident Analysis and Prevention 68, pp.95–105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.019

R.M. Choundhry, Behavior-based safety on construction sites: A case study, 2014, Accident Analysis and Prevention 70, pp.14-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.03.007

Health and Safety Executive: Evidence base for identifying potential failures in the specification , use and maintenance of PPE at work, 2006.

M. J. Burke, Relative Effectiveness of Worker Safety and Health Training Methods, 2006, American Journal of Public Helath 96, pp. 315-324.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2004.059840

P. Becker, J. Morawetz, Impacts of Health and Safety Education: Comparison of Worker Activities Before and After Training, 2004, American Journal of Industrial Medicine 46, pp. 63-70.

D. J. Smith, Reliability, Maintainability and Risk - Practical methods for engineers (6th Edition), 2001, Butterworth-Heinemann.

Z. Yuan et al., Risk-Based Design of Safety Measures to Prevent and Mitigate Dust Explosion Hazards, 2013, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Reaserch 52, pp. 18095-18108.

A. Gavious et al., The costs of industrial accidents for the organization: Developing methods and tools for evaluation and cost–benefit analysis of investment in safety, 2009, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22, pp.434–438.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.02.008

M. Di Nardo,M.Gallo,L.C. Santillo, A Conceptual Model of Human Behaviour in Socio –technical Systems, Chapter Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tool and Techniques Volume 532 of the series Communications and Information Science pp598-609.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22689-7_46


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize