Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Comparative Analysis of System Dynamics Software Packages


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v8i2.5401

Abstract


There are various modeling techniques used worldwide. Capturing system dynamics with support of appropriate software packages represents a field of study, which is applied in various domains and real-life situations. This paper first introduces particular applications for modeling and simulation of dynamics based on stock-and-flow diagrams. Afterwards, these applications are compared by means of usability evaluation tools, and lessons learned from the evaluation process and modeling and simulation experience are introduced. Therefore, issues like standardization and unification procedures, necessity to capture historical data timelines, or transformation of common speech to a model during conceptualization stage are discussed.
Copyright © 2015 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Comparative Analysis; Lessons Learned; Modeling and Simulation; System Dynamics

Full Text:

PDF


References


Tucnik, P., Bures, V., Inclusion of complexity: Modelling enterprise business environment by means of agent-based simulation, (2013) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 6 (5), pp. 1709-1717.

Esbai, R., Erramdani, M., Mbarki, S., Model-driven transformation for GWT with approach by modeling: From UML model to MVP web applications, (2014) International Review on Computers and Software (IRECOS), 9 (9), pp. 1612-1620.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15866/irecos.v9i9.3361

V. Bureš, Systems thinking as a basis for ambient intelligence, Proceedings of the 11th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp. 318-318, Bologna, Italy, June 2006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1140124.1140224

V. Bureš, P. Tučník, Complex Agent-based Models: Application of a constructivism in the Economic Research, E+M Ekonomie a Management, Vol. 17(Issue 3):152-168, 2014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2014-3-012

P. Tučník, P. Čech, and V. Bureš, Self-organizational aspects and adaptation of agent-based simulation based on economic principles, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 240:463-472, 2014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01857-7_45

S. Luo, Y. Du, P. Liu, Z. Xuan, and Y. Wang, A study on coevolutionary dynamics of knowledge diffusion and social network structure, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42(Issue 7): 3619-3633, May 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.038

A. Borshchev, A. Filippov, From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling: Reasons, Techniques, Tools, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Oxford, UK, July 2004.

J. W. Forrester, System Dynamics-A Personal View of the First Fifty Years, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 23(Issue 2-3):345–358, October 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.382

N. Zainal Abidin et al., Combating Obesity through Healthy Eating Behavior: A Call for System Dynamics Optimization, PLoS One, Vol. 9(Issue 12):e114135, December 2014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114135

J. D. Sterman, Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World (Irwin McGraw-Hill, 2000).

Centobelli, P., Converso, G., Murino, T., Santillo, L.C., Banking operations and strategic marketing plans: A causal loop based model for finance sector, (2013) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 6 (5), pp. 1695-1708.

A.T. Azar, System Dynamics as a Useful Technique for Complex Systems, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Vol. 10(Issue 4):377-410, 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijise.2012.046298

Y. Barlas, Formal Aspects of Model Validity and Validation in System Dynamics, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 12(Issue 3):183-210, December 1996.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1727(199623)12:3%3C183::aid-sdr103%3E3.0.co;2-4

Y. Mo, L. Li, and W. Huang, System Dynamics Modeling and Simulation of Two-Stage Remanufacturing Reverse Supply Chain, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 286:29-38, 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44674-4_3

D. A. Norman, The Psychology of Everyday Things (Basic books, 1988).

N. Tractinsky, Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing, pp. 115-122, Atlanta, March 1997.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/258549.258626

M. Kurosu, K. Kashimura, Apparent usability vs. Inherent usability, Proceedings of the CHI ‘95 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 292-293, Denver, May 1995.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/223355.223680

J. Pavlík, V. Soběslav, J. Horálek, Statistics and analysis of service availability in cloud computing, Proceedings of the 18th International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium, pp. 310-313, Porto, Portugal, July 2014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2628194.2628222

R. Cimler, J. Matyska, L. Balík, J. Horálek, and V. Soběslav, Security issues of mobile application using cloud computing, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 334:347-357, 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13572-4_29

J. Brooke, SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale (Taylor and Francis, 1996, pp. 89-194).

A. Bangor, P. Kortum, and J. Miller, Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale, Journal of Usability Studies, Vol. 4(Issue 3):114-123, May 2009.

C. E. Kampmann, Feedback loop gains and system behavior (1996), System Dynamics Review, Vol. 28(Issue 4):370-395, October/December 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1483

J. W. Forrester, Economic theory for the new millennium (2003), System Dynamics Review, Vol. 29(Issue 1):26-41, January/March 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1490

Y. Yang, J. Li, and Q. Zhao, Study on passenger flow simulation in urban subway station based on anylogic, Journal of Software, Vol. 9(Issue 1):140-146, January 2014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jsw.9.1.140-146

G. Zimmerman, J. Barnes, L. Leventhal, A comparison of the usability and effectiveness of web-based delivery of instructions for inherently-3D construction tasks on handheld and desktop computers, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on 3D Web Technology, pp. 49-54, Tempe, AZ, February 2002.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/636593.636601

E. Pruyt, J. H. Kwakkel, Radicalization under deep uncertainty: A multi-model exploration of activism, extremism, and terrorism, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 30(Issue 1-2):1-28, January/June 2014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1510

D. Fiorello, F. Fermi, and D. Bielanska, The astra model for strategic assessment of transport policies, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 26(Issue 3):283-290, July/September 2010.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.452

R. L. Eberlein, K. J. Chichakly, XMILE: A new standard for system dynamics, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 29(Issue 3):188-195, July/September 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1504

I. J. Martinez-Moyano, Document Documentation for model transparency, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 28 (Issue 2):199-208, April/June 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1471

J. Bézivin, On the unification power of models, Software and Systems Modeling, Vol. 4(Issue 2):171-188, May 2005.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-005-0079-0

J. Randers, Elements of the System Dynamics Method (Productivity Press, 1980).

C.E Kampmann, R. Oliva, Analytical methods for structural dominance analysis in system dynamics (Springer, 2009, pp. 8948–8967).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_535

N. Forrester, Eigenvalue Analysis of Dominant Feedback Loops, Proceedings of the International System Dynamics Conference, Plenary Session Papers, pp. 178-202, Chestnut Hill, MA, 1983.

D. N. Ford, A behavioral approach to feedback loop dominance analysis, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 15(Issue 1):3-36, Spring 1999.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1727(199921)15:1%3C3::aid-sdr159%3E3.0.co;2-p

J. Hayward, G. P. Boswell, Model behaviour and the concept of loop impact: A practical method, System Dynamics Review, 30 (Issue 1-2):29-57, January/June 2014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1511

G. P. Richardson, Concept models in group model building, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 29(Issue 1):42-55, January/March 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1487

I. J. Martinez-Moyano, G. P. Richardson, Best practices in system dynamics modeling, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 29(Issue 2):102-123, April/June 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1495

C. Mueller, Object-oriented SPSPR-Model, Journal of Systems Integration, Vol. 6(Issue 1):3-11, January 2015.

J. Richardson, The past is prologue: Reflections on forty-plus years of system dynamics modeling practice, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 29(Issue 3):172-187, July/September 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1503

M. Grana, F. J. Torrealdea, and F. Ferreres, Comparison Between Stochastic and Deterministic Simulation: Modelling in GPSS and Dynamo, Advances in modelling & simulation, Vol. 5(Issue 4):15-32, 1986.

P. Mikulecký, User adaptivity in smart workplaces, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7197(Part 2):401-410, March 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28490-8_42

O. Krejcar, D. Janckulik, and L. Motalová, Practical issues of wireless mobile devices usage with downlink optimization, Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, Vol. 16: 294-305, August 2009.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11284-3_30

P. Grulich, Computer technology in teaching Archiving, Archiving Journal (Archivní časopis), Vol. 64: 210-215, 2014.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2022 Praise Worthy Prize