Performance Assessment of Fertilizer Industry Supply Chain Using a System Dynamics Approach
(*) Corresponding author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/ireme.v17i11.24104
Abstract
The Indonesian fertilizer industry strongly emphasizes supply chain activities, but the high logistics costs remain a pressing challenge that needs urgent resolution. Therefore, this study has aimed to identify the most efficient fertilizer distribution costs in order to enhance the affordability of subsidized fertilizer allocation to the benefit of farmers. The paper has explored the application of system dynamics to address complex challenges in supply chain management. Two schemes for distributing fertilizer have been examined, namely the single trip and the milk run schemes. A case study focusing on fertilizer distribution in Cluster 4 (Dumai, Pangkal Pinang, and Bengkulu) has been conducted. Through distribution simulation, the goal has been to minimize operational costs based on these two schemes and achieve cost reduction by varying ship sizes. The simulation results have eventually favored the milk run scheme as the most cost-effective option for Dumai, Pangkal Pinang, and Bengkulu.
Copyright © 2023 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adiguzel Z. Competitive Advantage and Competitive Dynamics in Terms of Strategic Innovation Orientation. In: Dinçer H, Yüksel S (eds) Financial Strategies in Competitive Markets. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 47-63.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68612-3_4
Asikhia O. Supply Chain Risk Management and Business Performance of Selected Oil and Gas Marketing Companies in Lagos State, Nigeria: Moderating Role of Firms' Size. JOPSC 2022; 6: 58-75.
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4054
Putri YD, Huda LN, Sinulingga S. The concept of supply chain management performance measurement with the supply chain operation reference model (Journal review). IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 2019; 505: 012011.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012011
Alzoubi, H M, Alshurideh, Muhammad Turki, Al Kurdi, Barween, Obeidat, Bader, Hamadneh, Samer and Ahmad, Alaa The influence of supply chain partners' integrations on organizational performance: The moderating role of trust. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10 (4). pp. 1191-1202.
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.8.009
Kumar A, Shrivastav SK, Shrivastava AK, et al. Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Performance Measurement, and Management: A Review. Sustainability 2023; 15: 5290.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065290
Payán-Sánchez B, Labella-Fernández A, Serrano-Arcos MM. Modern age of sustainability. In: Sustainable Resource Management. Elsevier, pp. 75-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00003-1
Mahdavi M, Mahmoudzadeh M, Olsen TL. Efficient vs. Responsive supplier selection for functional and innovative products: A quantitative study. International Journal of Production Economics 2023; 255: 108656.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108656
Zutsara F. Supply Chain Management in Agricultural Industry. JLL 2022; 2: 18-24.
https://doi.org/10.37899/journallalifesci.v2i6.539
Yang H, Waugh DW, Orbe C, et al. Evaluating Simulations of Interhemispheric Transport: Interhemispheric Exchange Time Versus SF6 Age. Geophysical Research Letters 2019; 46: 1113-1120.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080960
Van Thanh N, Thi Kim Lan N, Tam Husain S, et al. Optimization Agricultural Supply Chain: A Case Study of Fertilizer Supplier Selection. Computers, Materials & Continua 2022; 72: 4057-4068.
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.026587
Ritchie H, Roser M, Rosado P. Fertilizers. Our World in Data, (2022, accessed 20 September 2023).
https://ourworldindata.org/fertilizers
Ickowitz A, Powell B, Rowland D, et al. Agricultural intensification, dietary diversity, and markets in the global food security narrative. Global Food Security 2019; 20: 9-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.11.002
Hussain S, Kerketta A. Effect of Organic Manure and Inorganic Fertilizer on Growth and Root Yield of Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.). IJECC 2023; 13: 1866-1870.
https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i82141
Yadav SL, Topno SE, Bahadur V, et al. Effect of Different Organic Manure and Inorganic Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). IJECC 2023; 13: 1990-1997.
https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i82156
Syamsiyah J, Herdiansyah G. Leaf nutrient content and corn growth with application of liquid organic fertilizer and inorganic fertilizer. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 2022; 1016: 012019.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1016/1/012019
Widodo J. State address of the President of the Republic of Indonesia on the occasion of the 74th anniversary of the proclamation of independence of the Republic Of Indonesia before the jpint session of the regional representatives council of the Republic of Indonesia and the house of representatives of the Republic of Indonesia.
Rafani I, Sudaryanto T. Update on Fertilizer Subsidy Policy in Indonesia: Perspective and Challenges. FFTC Agricultural Policy Platform (FFTC-AP), (6 July 2023, accessed 20 September 2023).
https://ap.fftc.org.tw/articles
The Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. The main points of the 2020 APBN: Accelerating Competitiveness through Innovation and Strengthening the Quality of Human Resources. The Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia, 2020.
Central Bureau of Statistics. Fertilizer Imports by Main Country of Origin, 2017-2022. Fertilizer Imports by Main Country of Origin, 2017-2022, (2023, accessed 10 August 2023).
https://www.bps.go.id/statictable/2014/09 /08/1044/impor-pupuk-menurut-negara-asal-utama-2017-2022.html
Prihanto BC, Pujawan IN. Re-Design Layout and Allocation of Raw Material Warehouses Using Simulation Methods to Minimize the Handling Cost from Port to Warehouses. In: IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2020, pp. 72-80.
https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2020i3.11081
Lorenz S, Gebler R, Bathelt F, et al. Evaluation of Modeling Approaches for a Clinical Data Warehouse in a Highly Dynamic Environment. In: Hägglund M, Blusi M, Bonacina S, et al. (eds) Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press. Epub ahead of print 18 May 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230257
Calvillo A. Warehousing costs skyrocket as pandemic shortages drag on. First Tuesday Journal, (2022, accessed 20 September 2023).
https://journal.firsttuesday.us/ warehousing-costs-skyrocket-as-pandemic-shortages-drag-on/82078/
Bahr W, Mavrogenis V, Sweeney E. Gamification of warehousing: exploring perspectives of warehouse managers in the UK. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 2022; 25: 247-259.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1892042
Sudiarta N, Gozali L, Anne Marie I, et al. Comparison Study about Warehouse Layout from Some Paper Case Studies. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 2020; 852: 012112.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/852/1/012112
Marques A, Soares R, Santos MJ, et al. Integrated planning of inbound and outbound logistics with a Rich Vehicle Routing Problem with backhauls. Omega 2020; 92: 102172.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102172
Scheibe KP, Blackhurst J. Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective. International Journal of Production Research 2018; 56: 43-59.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1355123
Sang TT, Minh Thu N, Hoang Khoi T, et al. The Optimization of Transportation Costs in Logistics Enterprises during the Covid-19 Pandemic. ARRUS J Math App Sci 2021; 1: 62-71.
https://doi.org/10.35877/mathscience567
Hamoudi K, Bellaouar A, Petiot R. A Model of Systems Dynamics for Physical Flow Analysis in a Distribution Supply Chain. Transport and Telecommunication Journal 2021; 22: 98-108.
https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2021-0008
Rebs T, Brandenburg M, Seuring S. System dynamics modeling for sustainable supply chain management: A literature review and systems thinking approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; 208: 1265-1280.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.100
Samudra FB, Sitorus SR, Santosa E, et al. Systems dynamic modeling on sustainable apples agriculture. JPSL 2022; 11: 567-577.
https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.11.4.567-577
Ong RJ, Raof RAA, Sudin S, et al. A Review of Chatbot development for Dynamic Web-based Knowledge Management System (KMS) in Small Scale Agriculture. J Phys: Conf Ser 2021; 1755: 012051.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1755/1/012051
Bastan M, Ramazani Khorshid-Doust R, Delshad Sisi S, et al. Sustainable development of agriculture: a system dynamics model. K 2018; 47: 142-162.
https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2017-0003
Bahadir MC, Akdag HC. The System Dynamics Modelling for Container Capacity & Transportation Planning Policies. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 2019; 35: 200-212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.12.007
Gkerekos C, Lazakis I, Theotokatos G. Machine learning models for predicting ship main engine Fuel Oil Consumption: A comparative study. Ocean Engineering 2019; 188: 106282.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106282
Nguyen VG, Rajamohan S, Rudzki K, et al. Using Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Ship Fuel Consumption. Polish Maritime Research 2023; 30: 39-60.
https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2023-0020
Widowati, W., Sutrisno, S., Azis, M., Magdalena, I., Control of Inventory Systems in Probabilistic Environment via Chance Constrained-Based Robust Predictive Controller, (2022) International Review of Automatic Control (IREACO), 15 (4), pp. 185-192.
https://doi.org/10.15866/ireaco.v15i4.21207
Wicaksono, P., Sutrisno, S., Solikhin, S., Aziz, A., Optimizing Raw Parts Procurement and Inventory Under Excess Demand Values and Unknown Prices in Post Pandemic Situations via Fuzzy Programming, (2023) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 16 (5), pp. 297-305.
https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v16i5.21552
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize