Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Analysis of Inspection Scheduling Program on Condensate Atmospheric Storage Tank Using Risk Based Inspection


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/ireme.v14i9.19000

Abstract


The technology development in the oil and gas industry is moving quite rapidly. It also brings the need of better safety requirement. In order to implement government regulations regarding the level of equipment safety, maintenance scheduling should be carried out for the requirements of the equipment used. The object of this research is the Atmospheric Storage Tank. Atmospheric storage tank is used to store hazardous liquids in the form of condensate oil. Damage to atmospheric storage tanks could cause considerable environmental damage. Inspections are carried out using risk based inspection. It is an inspection method of management of equipment or work units based on the level of importance of the equipment or work unit. The results indicate that the magnitude of the risk at the date of the RBI is 0.044 m2. The storage tank will be accessed in the 6th year after RBI analysis. The total risk at the target date after the Inspection is 0.047 m2.
Copyright © 2020 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Atmospheric Storage Tank; Tank; Inspection; Risk; Risk Based Inspection; API 581; RBI

Full Text:

PDF


References


Yu Feng, Yujiu Yang and Biqing Huang. Corrosion analysis and remaining usefullife prediction for storage tank bottom, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 16 (5), pp.1-9. 2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881419877051

Nugroho, A., Haryadi, GD., Ismail, R., Kim, J. S,. Risk based inspection for atmospheric storage tank. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1725, pp;1-8. 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945509

Deif S, Leier B, Snow M, et al.. Microwave sensor array for corrosion prediction in steel tank bottoms. In: 2018 12th international pipeline conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,24–28 September 2018, pp. V001T03A037–V001T03A037. Alberta, Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2018-78224

Gong K and Hu J. Online detection and evaluation of tankbottom corrosion based on acoustic emission. In: Z Qu and J.Lin (eds) Proceedings of the international field explorationand development conference, Chengdu, China, 21 Sep-tember–22 September 2017, pp. 1284–1291. Singapore: Springer. 2017

ISO 31000. Risk Management Guidelines. 2018.
https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-riskmanagement.html

Zio, E. The Future of Risk Assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 177, pp.176–190.2018.

Aven, T. On the new ISO guide on risk management terminology. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96(7), pp.719–726, 2017.

Kanes, R.; Ramirez-Marengo, C.; Abdel-Moati, H.; Cranefield, J.; Véchot, L. Developing a framework for dynamic risk assessment using Bayesian networks and reliability data. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind, 50, pp. 142–153, 2017
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.09.011

He, R., Dai, Y., Lu, J. and Mou, C., Developing ladder network for intelligent evaluation system: Case of remaining useful life prediction for centrifugal pumps. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 180, pp.385-393, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.08.010

Paltrinieri, N.; Reniers, G. Dynamic Risk Analysis for Seveso sites. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind., 49, pp. 111–119. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.03.023

Yang, X.; Haugen, S.; Paltrinieri, N. Clarifying the concept of operational risk assessment in the oil and gas industry. Saf. Sci., 108, pp. 259–268, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.019

Nguyen, K.T. and Medjaher, K., A new dynamic predictive maintenance framework using deep learning for failure prognostics. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 188, pp.251-262, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.018

Siswantoro, N., Semin, S., Zaman, M., Criticality Assessment for Marine Diesel Engine Using Failure Mode and Effect Criticality Analysis (FMECA) Approach: Case Study on Lubricating Oil System, (2020) International Review of Mechanical Engineering (IREME), 14 (4), pp. 258-263.
https://doi.org/10.15866/ireme.v14i4.18060

W. Xi, Z. Li, Z. Tian and Z. Duan,. A Feature Extraction and Visualization Method for Fault Detection of Marine Diesel Engines, Measurement, Vol. 116, pp. 429–437, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.11.035

S. Rahmad S. H., Priharanto Y. E. and A. M. Zaki Latif, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Applied for Risk Assessment of Fuel Oil System on Diesel Engine of Fishing Vessel, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(21), pp. 8414-8420, 2018.

B. Goo, J. Lee, S. Seo, D.Chang and H. Chung, Design of Reliability Critical System Using Axiomatic Design with FMECA, International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 11, n. 1, pp. 11-21, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.11.004

E. Akyuz and E. Celik, A Quantitative Risk Analysis by Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy FMEA Approach: The Case of Oil Spill, Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 45, n. 8, pp. 979-994, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1520401

Santoso, A., Semin, S., Sampurno, B., Cahyono, B., Zaman, M., New Development of Piston Crown for Dual Fuel Diesel Engine to Improve Efficiency and Reduce NOx Emissions: a Review, (2020) International Journal on Engineering Applications (IREA), 8 (1), pp. 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.15866/irea.v8i1.17449

Gerassis, S., Albuquerque, M. T. D., García, J. F., Boente, C., Giráldez, E., Taboada, J. and Martín, J. E. Understanding complex blasting operations: A structural equation model combining Bayesian networks and latent class clustering. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 188, pp.195-204. 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.032

Chang, J.I. Lin C.C.A. Study of Storage Tank Accident. Taiwan. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 19 pp. 51–59, 2006.

Rachman, A.; Ratnayake, R.C. Machine learning approach for risk-based inspection screening assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 185, pp.518–532, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.008

Luque, J.; Straub, D. Risk-based optimal inspection strategies for structural systems using dynamic Bayesian network. Struct. Saf., 76, 68–80, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.08.002

API RP 580. Risk-Based Inspection. API Recommended Practice 580, 3rd Edition, February 2016.

API RP 581. Risk-Based Inspection Technology. API Recommended Practice 581, 3rd Edition, April 2016

R. Islam, F. Khan, R. Abbassi and V. Garaniya, Human Error Probability Assessment During Maintenance Activities of Marine Systems, Safety and Health at Work, Vol. 9, n. 1, pp. 42-52, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.06.008

S. Carpitella, A. Certa, J. Izquierdo and C. M. La Fata, A Combined Multi-Criteria Approach to Support FMECA Analyses: A Real-World Case, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 169, pp. 394-402, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.017

H. C. Liu, L. E Wang, X. Y You and S. M. Wu, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis with Extended Grey Relational Analysis Method in Cloud Setting, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, Vol. 30, n. 7-8, pp. 745-767, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1337506

Nugroho, A., Haryadi, G.H., Ismail, R., Kim J.S. Study of A Risk Based Atmospheric Storage Tank Inspection Guideline System Based on API 581. The 21st development of research and technology in industry field, 03.2015.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945509

Topalis, P., Korneliussen G., Singh M., Wiggen F. New Generation Risk Based Inspection Methodology and Software for the Process Industry, COMADEM 2011, Stavanger 2011.

Hou, P,. Yi, x,. Dong, H,. A Spatial Statistic Based Risk Assessment Approach to Prioritize the Pipeline Inspection of the Pipeline Network, Energies, 13(3), pp.1-16, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13030685

Anbari, M.J.; Tabesh, M.; Roozbahani, A. Risk assessment model to prioritize sewer pipes inspection in wastewater collection networks. J. Environ. Manag. 190, pp. 91–101, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.052

Mancuso, A.; Compare, M.; Salo, A.; Zio, E.; Laakso, T. Risk-based optimization of pipe inspections in large underground networks with imprecise information. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 152, pp.228–238, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.011

Cagno, E.; Caron, F.; Mancini, M.; Ruggeri, F. Using AHP in determining the prior distributions on gas pipeline failures in a robust Bayesian approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 67, pp.275–284, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(99)00070-8

Meng, X.K.; Chen, G.M.; Zhu, G.G.; Zhu, Y. Dynamic quantitative risk assessment of accidents induced by leakage on offshore platforms using DEMATEL-BN. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng., 11(1), pp.22–32, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.12.001

Wu, S.M.; Zhang, L.B.; Fan, J.C.; Zhou, Y.F. Dynamic risk analysis of hydrogen sulfide leakage for offshore natural gas wells in MPD phases. Proc. Saf. Environ. Protect, 122, pp. 339–351.2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.12.013

Rostamabadi, A.; Jahangiri, M.; Zarei, E.; Kamalinia, M.; Alimohammadlou, M. A novel Fuzzy Bayesian Network approach for safety analysis of process systems; An application of HFACS and SHIPP methodology. J. Clean. Prod, 244, 118761, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118761

Hegde, J.; Rokseth, B. Applications of machine learning methods for engineering risk assessment-A review. Saf. Sci., 122, 104492, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.015

Syed, Z.; Lawryshyn, Y. Risk analysis of an underground gas storage facility using a physics-based T system performance model and Monte Carlo simulation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 199, 106792, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106792

Ung, S.-T. Evaluation of human error contribution to oil tanker collision using fault tree analysis and modi ed fuzzy Bayesian Network based CREAM. Ocean Eng. 179, pp.159–172, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.031

Zaman M B, Santoso A, Hasanudin, Busse W, Risk Evaluation of Ferry in Bali Straits Using FMEA Method, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 557, 2nd Maritime Safety International Conference (MASTIC) 18-Jul-20, Surabaya, Indonesia pp. 1-7, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/557/1/012045

Zaman, M. B, Kobayashi, E., Wakabayashi,N., Khanfir, S., Pitana T.,and Maimun A. Fuzzy FMEA model for risk evaluation of ship collisions in the malacca strait: based on ais data Journal of Simulation, 8(1), pp. 91–104, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2013.9

Singh, K.; Maiti, J. A novel data mining approach for analysis of accident paths and performance assessment of risk control systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 202, 107041, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107041

Chen, C.; Reniers, G.; Khakzad, N. A thorough classification and discussion of approaches for modeling and managing domino effects in the process industries. Saf. Sci., 125, 104618, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104618


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize