Performance Evaluation of Yaw Meter with the Aid of Computational Fluid Dynamic

J. V. Muruga Lal Jeyan(1*), M. Senthil Kumar(2)

(1) Research scholar of PRIST university and working as HOD in Satyam College of Engineering and Technology, India
(2) Associate Dean in Faculty of Engg & Technology, Prist University, Thanjavur-613403, India
(*) Corresponding author


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


A multi-hole conical probe is employed to determine the velocity of the air flow, total and static pressures of the wind tunnel, wave angle in addition to estimating the noise of the test segment. It twinkles with the unique qualities of being trouble-free, vigorous with the flexibility to be applied even in ruthless situations. Our innovative conical wedge type probe is launched by means of AUTOCAD and engineered by exploiting the stain less steel material. The pressure holes are situated at the end of the conical probe which is applied to calculate the pressure and flow velocity of the atmosphere. The novel probe is performed at supersonic settings by the effective use of the proficient Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis (CFD analysis) software. It discharges the task of assessing the enduring competence of the projected probe under a variety of situations like fixed pressure and temperature along with the velocity of the air flow at different mach-numbers. This sample fashioned blueprint built up in CFD is estimated under supersonic backdrops up to mach 3. Thus, it is crystal clear that that our well-conceived sample developed with semi nose angle 20º  ushers in a sterling performance  in mach 2.8 triggering an incredible shock wave of 29.3º
Copyright © 2014 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Multi-Hole Probe; Wedge Type Probe; Shock Wave Angle; Mach Number; CFD Analysis

Full Text:

PDF


References


Demetri Telionis, and Yihong Yang, “Recent Developments in Multi-Hole Probe (MHP) Technology”, in proceedings of Mechanical Engineering, pp.15-20, Brazil, Nov 2009.

Peter Kupferschmied, Pascal Koppel, WilliamGizzi, Christian Roduner and Georg Gyarmathy, “Time-resolved flow measurements with fast-response aerodynamic probes in turbo machines”, Journal of Measurements and Science Technology, Vol.11, pp.1034-1056, 2000.

Davidlippett, Petertimmis, Paulivey, Davidbailey, and Gordonwoollatt, “Development of a New High-Speed Multi-Stage Compressor Facility; Experimental Set Up”, in proceedings of the International Gas Turbine, pp.2-7, Tokyo, November2003.

Susheela V. Mallipudi and Michael Selig, “ Use of a Four-Hole Cobra Pressure Probe to Determine the Unsteady Wake Characteristics of Rotating Objects”, in proceedings of Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing, Paper Number: AIAA-2004-2299, Portland,July,2004.

A.J. Pisasale, and N.A. Ahmed, “A novel method for extending the calibration range of five-hole probe for highly three-dimensional flows”, Elsevier Journal of Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol.13,pp. 23–30,2002.

A. Robert Porro, “Pressure probe designs for dynamic pressure measurements in a supersonic flow field”, in proceedings of Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities, pp. 417 – 426, Cleveland, OH, ,Aug 2001.

J. Chen, B.S. Haynes, and D.F. Fletcher, “Cobra probe measurements of mean velocities, Reynolds stresses and higher-order velocity correlations in pipe flow”, Elsevier Journal of Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science ,Vol.21,pp.206-217,2000.

J. D. Hooper, and A. R. Musgrove, “ Reynolds Stress, Mean Velocity, and Dynamic Static Pressure Measurement by a Four-Hole Pressure Probe”, Elsevier Journal of Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science,Vol.15,pp.375-383,1997.

Grant Ingram, and David Gregory-Smith, “An automated instrumentation system for flow and loss measurements in a cascade”, Elsevier Journal of Flow Measurement and Instrumentation”, Vol. 17, pp. 23–28, 2006.

TolgaYasa, and GuillermoPaniagua,“Robust procedure for multi-hole probe data processing”, Elsevier Journal of Flow Measurement and Instrumentation,Vol. 26,pp.46–54,2012.

Joel F.Campbell, and Jay M.Brandon, “ Calibration and flight results for the Ares I-X 5-hole probe”, Elsevier Journal of Acta Astronautica,Vol.68,pp.1219–1227,2011.

S.J. Lien, and N.A. Ahmed, “An examination of suitability of multi-hole pressure probe technique for skin friction measurement in turbulent flow”, Elsevier Journal of Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol.22, pp.153–164, 2011.

Christopher Crowley, IosifI Shinder, and Michael R.Moldover, “The effect of turbulence on a multi-hole Pitot”, Elsevier Journal of Flow Measurement and Instrumentation”, Vol.33, pp.106–109, 2013.

Sung chan Kim, and Jung yong Kim, “The effect of flow approaching angle on the velocity measurement using bi-directional probe”, Elsevier Journal of Procedia Engineering, Vol.62, pp.797–803, 2013.

Sanuddin, A.B., Azmi, H., Hussin, M.S., Abidin, Z.Z., Hamzas, M.F.M.A., Kartik, V., The effect of sintering duration on mechanical properties of Al/SiC composites, (2013) International Review of Mechanical Engineering (IREME), 7 (7), pp. 1340-1346.

Biswas, A.K., Sinha, P.K., Mullick, A.N., Majumdar, B., CFD investigation of flow through a constant area curved duct, (2012) International Review of Mechanical Engineering (IREME), 6 (7), pp. 1654-1660.

Ragoth Singh, R., Nataraj, M., Surendar, S., Siva, M., Investigation of a centrifugal pump impeller vane profile using CFD, (2013) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 6 (4), pp. 1327-1333.

Mebarki, B., Draoui, B., Rahmani, L., Abbou, T., Bouanini, M., Benachour, E., Using CFD simulation to study mechanical agitation of yield stress fluid induced by a gate impeller, (2011) International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS), 4 (2), pp. 896-902.

Kyparissis, S.D., Douvi, E.C., Panagiotopoulos, E.E., Margaris, D.P., Filios, A.E., CFD flowfield analysis and hydrodynamic double-arc blade design effects for optimum centrifugal pump performance, (2009) International Review of Mechanical Engineering (IREME), 3 (3), pp. 284-292.


Refbacks




Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2021 Praise Worthy Prize