Recognition Method for Key Knowledge Subjects in Knowledge Network


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


In order to recognize the key knowledge subjects from knowledge network in large scale, an extracting method with dynamic interaction idea is constructed to gradually attain the subjective evidence information from organizational managers' knowledge, experiences and intuition. Then a dynamic knowledge matrix is utilized to suggest a deduction theorem that can effectively convert basic probability assignment (BPA) functions from subjective deduction information. After that, the Pignistic probability and the ABC analytical method are employed to illustrate the specific process of recognizing key knowledge subjects in the knowledge network. Finally a case simulation analysis is utilized to testify the validity and the feasibility of the proposed method.
Copyright © 2020 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Knowledge Network; Knowledge Subject; Dynamic Knowledge Matrix; Evidence Theory; Recognition Method

Full Text:

PDF


References


S.L. Jarvenpaa, H. Tanriverdi, Leading virtual knowledge networks, Organizational Dynamics, vol. 31, n. 4, pp403-412, 2003.

K. Chai, C. Yap, X. Wang, Network closure's impact on firms’ competitive advantage: The mediating roles of knowledge processes, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 28, n. 2, pp2-22, 2011.

D. Tapscott, A.D. Williams, Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything (New York: Portfolio Trade, 2006).

D. Tapscott, A.D. Williams, Macrowikinomics: Rebooting Business and the World (New York: Portfolio Penguin, 2010).

M. Janhonen, J. Johanson, Role of knowledge conversion and social networks in team performance, International Journal of Information Management, vol. 31, n. 3, pp217-225, 2011.

C. Roth, J. Cointet, Social and semantic coevolution in knowledge networks, Social Networks, vol. 32, n. 1, pp16-29, 2010.

Y. Ju, A. Wang, Emergency alternative evaluation under group decision makers: A method of incorporating DS/AHP with extended TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, n. 1, pp1315-1323, 2012.

B. Quost, M. Masson, T. Denoeux, Classifier fusion in the Dempster-Shafer framework using optimized t-norm based combination rules, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 52, n. 3, pp353-374, 2011.

Z. Xu, M. Xia, Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy operators, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, n. 2, pp197-209, 2011.

M.J. Beynon, Understanding local ignorance and non-specificity within the DS/AHP method of multi-criteria decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 163, n. 2, pp403-417, 2005.

D. Yong, S. Wenkang, Z. Zhenfu, L. Qi, Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence, Decision Support Systems, vol. 38, n. 3, pp489-493, 2004.

A. Jousselme, P. Maupin, Distances in evidence theory: Comprehensive survey and generalizations, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 53, n. 2, pp118-145, 2012.

B. Kaihong Guoa, L. Wenli, Combination rule of D–S evidence theory based on the strategy of cross merging between evidences, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, n. 10, pp13360-13366, 2011.

J. Schubert, Conflict management in Dempster-Shafer theory using the degree of falsity, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 52, n. 3, pp449-460, 2011.

A. Kallel, S.L. Hégarat-Mascle, Combination of partially non-distinct beliefs: The cautious-adaptive rule, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 50, n. 7, pp1000-1021, 2009.

T.D. Pham, Fuzzy posterior-probabilistic fusion, Pattern Recognition, vol. 44, n. 5, pp1023-1030, 2011.

E. Zervas, A. Mpimpoudis, C. Anagnostopoulos, O. Sekkas, S. Hadjiefthymiades, Multisensor data fusion for fire detection, Information Fusion, vol. 12, n. 3, pp150-159, 2011.

S. Panigrahi, A. Kundu, S. Sural, A.K. Majumdar, Credit card fraud detection: A fusion approach using Dempster-Shafer theory and Bayesian learning, Information Fusion, vol. 10, n. 4, pp354-363, 2009.

D.H. Gensch, E.S. Soofi, Information-theoretic estimation of individual consideration set, International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 12, n. 1, pp25-38, 1995.

T.L. Saaty, Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP : Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 46, n. 7-8, pp860-891, 2007.

E. Karni, Unknowable states and choice-based definitions of subjective probabilities, Economics Letters, vol. 99, n. 3, pp534-536, 2008.

D.F. Li, An approach to fuzzy multiattribute decision making under uncertainty, Information Sciences, vol. 169, n. 1-2, pp97-112, 2005.

W.W. Huang, Impacts of GSS generic structures and task types on group communication process and outcome: some expected and unexpected research findings, Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 22, n. 1, pp17-29, 2003.

J.E. Guo,Y.T. Bai,Y.R. Xi,Y. Wang, Effects of authority type and decision procedure on TMT decision-making process: A laboratory experiment, Journal of management sciences in China, vol. 11, n. 6, pp1-10, 2008.

S. Chopra, P. Meindl, Supply Chain Management Strategy, Planning, and Operation, (United States ed edition, 2000).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize