Aided-Computer Evaluation of Nonlinear Combination of Financial Forecast with Genetic Algorithm

A. Ozun(1*), A. Cifter(2)

(1) Marmara University, Department of Informatics, Turkey
(2) Marmara University, Department of Econometrics, Turkey
(*) Corresponding author


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


Complexity in the financial markets requires intelligent forecasting models for return volatility. In this paper, historical simulation, GARCH, GARCH with skewed student-t distribution and asymmetric normal mixture GRJ-GARCH models are combined with Extreme Value Theory Hill by using artificial neural networks with genetic algorithm as the combination platform. By employing daily closing values of the Istanbul Stock Exchange from 01/10/1996 to 11/07/2006, Kupiec and Christoffersen tests as the back-testing mechanisms are performed for forecast comparison of the models. Empirical findings show that the fat-tails are more properly captured by the combination of GARCH with skewed student-t distribution and Extreme Value Theory Hill. Modeling return volatility in the emerging markets needs “intelligent” combinations of Value-at-Risk models to capture the extreme movements in the markets rather than individual model.
Copyright © 2015 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Forecast Combination; Artificial Neural Networks; GARCH Models; Extreme Value Theory; Christoffersen Test

Full Text:

PDF


References


McNeil, A. J., (1996) "Estimating The Tails of Loss Severity Distributions Using Extreme Value Theory, Mimeo. ETH Zentrum, Zürich.

Neftci, S., (2000) “Value at Risk Calculations, Extreme Events, and Tail Estimation,” The Journal of Derivatives, Spring 2000.

Engle, F., (1982) “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimate of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation,” Econometrica, 50, pp.987-1007.

Bollerslev, T., (1986) “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics, 31, pp.307–327

Peters, JP., (2001) Estimating and Forecasting Volatility of Stock Indices Using Asymmetric Garch Models and (Skewed) Student-t Densities, Mimeo, Ecole d’Admin. des Affaires, Unv.of Li`ege.

Bollerslev, T. (1987) “A Conditional Heteroskedasticity Time Series Model for Speculative Prices and Rates of Return,” Review of Economic and Statistics. 69, pp.542-547.

Hsieh, D. A. (1989) “Modeling Heteroskedasticity in Daily Foreign Exchange Rates,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, pp.307-317.

Baillie, R. T. and Bollerslev, T., (1989) “The Message in Daily Exchange Rates: A Conditional-Variance Tale,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, pp.297-305.

Palm, F. and Vlaar, P. JG., (1997) “Simple Diagnostics Procedures for Modeling Financial Time Series,” Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 81, pp.85-101

Saltoğlu, B. (2003) A High Frequency Analysis of Financial Risk and Crisis: An Empirical Study on Turkish Financial Market, Yaylım Publishing, Istanbul.

Fernandez, C., and Mark S. (1998) “On Bayesian Modeling of fat tails and skewness,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, pp.359-371.

Glosten, L. R., Jagahannathan, R., and Runkle, D. E., (1993) “On the Relationship between the Expected Value and The Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks,” Journal of Finance, 48, pp.1779-1801.

Palm, F., (1996) “Garch Models of Volatility”, in Handbook of Statistics, ed. By G.Maddala, and C.Rao, pp.209-240, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

Pagan, A., (1996) “The Econometrics of Financial Markets,” Journal of Empirical Finance, 3, pp.15-102.

Bollerslev, T., Chou, R.Y. and Kroner, K.F., (1992) “ARCH Modeling in Finance: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Economics and Statistics, 69, pp.542-547.

Christoffersen, P. F., and Jacobs, K., (2004) “Which Garch Model for Option Valuation?,” Management Science, 50, pp.1204-1221.

Bekaert, G., and Wu, G., (2000) “Asymmetric Volatility and Risk Equity Markets,” The Review of Financial Studies, 13(1), pp.1-42.

Wu, G., (2001) “The Determinants of Asymmetric Volatility,” The Review of Financial Studies. 14(3), pp.837-859.

Christoffersen, P. F., Heston, S. and Jacobs, K. (2004) “Option Valuation with Conditional Skewness,” Forthcoming in The Journal of Econometrics.

Bates, D. S., (1991) “The Crash of ’87: Was It Expected? The Evidence from Options Markets,” Journal of Finance, 46, pp.1009-1044.

Alexander, C. and Lazar, E., (2006) “Normal Mixture GARCH(1,1):Applications to Exchange Rate Modeling,” Journal of Applied Econometrics 21(3), pp.307-336.

Liu (2005) “Value-at-Risk Model Combination Using Artificial Neural Networks,” Emory University Working Paper Series.

McNeil A. J. and Frey, R. (2000) “Estimation of tail-related risk measures for Heteroscedastic Financial time series: An extreme value approach,”Journal of Empirical Finance, 7, 271-300.

Hill, B. M. (1975) “A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution,” Annals of Statistics, 3, 1163-1174.

Maasoumi, E., A. Khotanzad, and A. Abaye (1994) “Artificial Neural Networks for Some Macroeconomic Series: A First Report,” Econometric Reviews, 13, No. 1.

Ozun, A., (2006) Theoretical Importance of Artificial Neural Networks For The Efficiency of Financial Markets, Proceedings of 5th International Finance Symposium: Integration in the Financial Markets, Vienna University&Marmara University with Cooperation of Istanbul Stock Exchange, 25-26 May, 2006, Istanbul.

Hecht R. and Nielsen.R (1990) Neurocomputing, Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Ltd.

White, H. (1994) “Neural Networks,” Econometric Reviews, Vol.13, No.1.

Rumelhart, D.E. & McClelland, J.L. (1986) “PDP Models and General Issues in Cognitive Science”. In D.E. Rumelhart & J.L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

Holland, J. (1965) “Universal spaces: A basis for studies of adaptation,” In Automata Theory. Caianiello, E. R. (ed.) Academic Press. 218-30.

Shanming Shi, Li D Xu, Bao Liu. (1996) “Application of artificical neural networks to the nonlinear combinmation of forecasts,” Expert Systems, 1996, 13(3):195-201.

Palit, AK and Popovic, D. (2000) “Nonlinear Combination of Forecasts Using Artificial Neural Networks, Fuzzy Logic and Neuro-Fuzzy Approach,” FUZZ-IEEE, Vol. 2, pp. 566-571, 2000.

Chang, Lo, Chen and Huang (2006) “Journal of Information & Optimization Sciences,” 27 (2006), No. 3, pp. 615–628.

Kupiec, P. H. (1995) “Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models,” Journal of Derivatives, winter, pp. 73-84.

Tang, T.L. and Shieh, S. J., (2006) “Long-Memory in Stock Index Futures Markets: A Value-at-Risk Approach,” Phsica A, Vol.366, pp.437-448.

Christoffersen, P.F. (1998) “Evaluating Interval Forecasts,” International Economic Review, 39, pp.841-862.

Dickey, D. A., Fuller, W.A. (1981) “Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root,” Econometrica, 49, pp.1057–1072.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2020 Praise Worthy Prize