A Multiple Aspect Data Model Design for Knowledge Discovery in Databases

M. Sassi(1*), A. Grissa Touzi(2), H. Ounelli(3)

(1) National School of Engineering of Tunis, Tunisia
(2) Department of Technologies of Information and Communications in the National School of Engineering of Tunis, Tunisia
(3) Computer sciences Department of Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, Tunisia
(*) Corresponding author


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


The unifying goal of the KDD process is to extract knowledge from data in the context of large databases. Data mining lies at the heart of the process. It makes it possible to extract information from the data. There are a great many different methods of data mining (classification, decision trees, neural networks, genetic algorithms, Formal Concept Analysis etc.). The choice of which methods to use depends on the purpose of the building model. It can have one of the following aspects: organizational or hierarchical. In this article, we present a model design joining both the two aspects and permit to the user a multiple choices of deployment.
Copyright © 2014 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Data Mining; Organizational Model; Clustering; Hierarchical Model; FCA; Fuzzy Logic

Full Text:

PDF


References


C. Combes, N. Meskens, C. Rivat, J.-P. Vandamme, Using KDD Process to Forecast the Duration of Surgery, IJPE: Int. J. Production Economics, 2006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.068

K. Uri and Z. Jianjun, Fuzzy Clustering Principles, Methods and Examples, IKS, December 1998.

H. Sun, S. Wanga, Q. Jiangb, FCM-Based Model Selection Algorithms for Determining the Number of Clusters, Pattern Recognition 37, 2004, p. 2027-2037.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2004.03.012

M. Halkidi, Y. Batistakis, M. Vazirgiannis, Clustering algorithms and validity measures, Proceedings of the Thirteenth IEEE International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM’01), Munich-Germany, 2001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ssdm.2001.938534

M. Sassi, A. Grissa Touzi, H. Ounelli, Using Gaussians Functions to Determine Representative Clustering Prototypes, DEXA : 17th IEEE International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Poland, 2006, p. 435-439.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dexa.2006.144

M. Sassi, A. Grissa Touzi, H. Ounelli, Interpretting Fuzzy Clustering Results based on Fuzzy Formal Concept Analyis, IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. Imperial College, London, UK, 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fuzzy.2007.4295476

M. Sassi, A., Grissa Touzi, H., Ounelli, Clustering Quality Evaluation based on Fuzzy FCA, 18th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications - DEXA '07, Regensburg, Germany, 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74469-6_62

R. Wille, Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts, in: I. Rival (Ed.), Ordered Sets, Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, 1982, p. 445–470.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7798-3_15

B. Gediga, R. Wille, Formal Concept Analysis, Mathematic Foundations, Springer, Berlin, 1999.

L. Chaudron, N. Maille, Generalized formal concept analysis, The 8th Internat. Conf. on Conceptual Structures, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1867, Springer, Berlin, 2000, p. 357–370.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/10722280_25

J.S. Deogun, J. Saqer, Monotone concepts for formal concept analysis, Discrete Appl. Math. 144, 2004, p. 70–78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2004.05.001

Y.Y. Yao, Concept lattices in rough set theory, Annu. Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 2004, p. 796–801.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/nafips.2004.1337404

I. Düntsch, G. Gediga, Modal-style operators in qualitative data analysis, in: Proc. 2002 IEEE Internat. Conf. on Data Mining, 2002, p. 155–162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2002.1183898

Y.Y. Yao, A comparative study of formal concept analysis and rough set theory in data analysis, in: S. Tsumoto, R. Slowinski, J. Komorowski et al. (Eds.), Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC 2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3066, Springer, Berlin, 2004, p. 59–68.

L. A Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inf. Control, vol. n° 8, p. 338-353, 1965.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x

A. Burusco , R. Fuentes-Gonzalez, Concepts associated to criteria: a method for knowledge processing from fuzzy contexts, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, v.10 n.2, 2002, p.173-184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218488502001405

S. Pollandt, Fuzzy Begriffe, Springer, Berlin, 1997.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60460-7

R. Belohlavek, Concept lattices and order in fuzzy logic, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 128, 2004, p. 277–298.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2003.01.001

R. Belohlavek, Algorithms for fuzzy concept lattices, RASC, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 12–13 December, 2002, p. 200–205.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2022 Praise Worthy Prize