Behavior of Continuous Composite Beams of Fiber Concrete Slab and Steel Beam

M. B. Abdul Rahman(1*), G. A. Mardan(2)

(1) University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq
(2) University of Tikrit, Iraq
(*) Corresponding author

DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)


This work deals with the behavior of structural continuous composite steel-concrete beams. In the present study, an experimental work has been done by casting and testing two simply supported composite beams, (with and without steel fibers) and two continuous composite beams (with and without steel fibers) up to failure to examine its behavior under static loads. The steel fiber volumetric percentage was 0.5 %. Also, cubic and cylindrical specimens have been cast and tested to determine the concrete compressive and tensile strengths. A high range water reducing admixture (HRWRA) and silica fume (SF) have been used as additives to enhance the fiber concrete properties. So, several trial mixes have been cast and tested to determine the better ratio of these mixtures with respect to the concrete mechanical properties. In the present research, available experimental tests on composite steel-concrete beams are theoretically analyzed using the finite element technique based on one dimensional model. The adopted one dimensional model is able to simulate the overall flexural behavior of composite beams, this covers; load-deflection behavior, longitudinal slip at the steel-concrete interface, and distribution of shear studs. Comparison between the experimental results (for deflection and loads of failure) with those obtained from the proposed finite element model indicates acceptable agreement. It is found that the difference in deflection value between experimental results and theoretical results for no-fiber simply supported composite beam reach 11%, and at 0.5 % steel fibers percentage reach 13 %. While in the continuous composite beam for plain concrete the difference in results may be 9 %, and at 0.5 % steel fibers percentage may be 12 %.
Copyright © 2018 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.


Composite Structures; Composite Steel – Concrete Beams; Continuous Beams; Fiber Reinforced Concrete; Experimental Work

Full Text:



Yam, L. C., Design of Composite Steel-Concrete Structures, Surrey University Press, London, 1981.

Al-Aquly, Q. A., Analysis of Continuous Composite Concrete – Steel Girders With Partial Interactio", B.Sc. Thesis, University of Baghdad, Iraq, 2003.

Spacone, E.A.M.ASCE, and El-Tawil, S.M.ASCE, Nonlinear Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Structures: State of the Art Journal of structural engineering, February 2004, pp.159-168.

Kwak, Y. k., Eberhard, M. O., Kim, W. S. and Kimm, J., Shear Strength of Steel Fiber –Reinforced Concrete Beams Without Stirrups, ACI structural journal, July-August 2002,pp.530-538.

Ibraheem, O. F.,"Static Analysis with Partial Interaction of Continuous Composite Beam of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Slab and Steel Beam, B.Sc. Thesis, University Al-Nahrain, Iraq, 2003.

Iraqi standard Specifications I.O.S No. 5/1984.

Silica fume association, Silica Fume User Manual 2005, pp.16, 20.

BEKAERT Company, Product Data Sheet, Resp. editor: Ann Lambrechts, Lauwe - 04/2005, Internet:

Sikament® FFN Data Sheet, SIKA Co. edition 11.10.2007.

ACI–Committee 211, Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete , ACI Manual of Concrete Practice, Part 1, 1991, reapproved 2002; pp. 211.1–2.

ASTM C143/C143M–03, Standard Test Methods for Slump of Hydraulic–Cement Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.02, 2004; pp. 95–98.

Chawla, K. K., Fibrous Reinforcements for Composites: Overview, in Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology, Elsevier Science Ltd., 2001, pp. 3160-3167.

ASTM C1018–97, Standard Test Methods for Flexural Toughness and First–Crack Strength of Fiber–Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third Point Loading), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.02, 2004; pp. 544–551.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Please send any question about this web site to
Copyright © 2005-2019 Praise Worthy Prize