Incident Wave Angle Effect on the Behaviour of Bent Embedded Pipe

Miad Saberi(1*), Mahmood Vafaeian(2), Farhad Behnamfar(3)

(1) Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, IAUB University, Iran, Islamic Republic of
(2) Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran, Islamic Republic of
(3) Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran, Islamic Republic of
(*) Corresponding author

DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)


Pipelines are important lifeline facilities distributed over a large area and they generally encounter a range of seismic hazards and soil conditions. Seismic wave propagation and its incidence affect the performance of buried pipes. Due to considerable stress concentration and additional flexural strains in the elbow region of pipelines, consideration of this area is important. This subject has been studied in the presented research. For this purpose, three dimensional finite element models have been employed. In these models beam elements and nonlinear spring elements are used for simulation of the buried pipelines and soil-pipe interaction, respectively. Moreover, an equivalent boundary condition has been used at the end of each leg of the pipe that simulates its infinite length more accurately. Incidence of waves with different angles causing time lag in vibration of different points has been studied as an important influencing parameter on a pipeline system. Also, the effect of soil type on seismic response of the buried pipe in bent area is considered in this paper. It is concluded that a direct relationship exists between larger soil stiffness and increasing axial elbow strains. Also inclined wave propagation multiples the elbow response compared to vertical propagation of waves. The peak response happens when waves travel parallel to a pipe leg.
Copyright © 2014 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.


Soil-Pipe Interaction; Embedded Pipe; Bend; Finite Element Method

Full Text:



N.M. Newmark, Problem in wave propagation in soil and rock, Proceeding International Symposium on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, pp. 7-26, 1967.

A. Sakurai, T. Takahashi, Dynamic stress of underground pipelines during earthquakes, Proceedings of the Fourth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Chilean Association on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, pp. 811-895, 1969.

M. Shinozuka, T. Koike, Estimation of structural strain in underground lifeline pipes, Lifeline Earthquake Engineering-Buried Pipeline, Seismic Risk, and Instrumentation, PVP-34, ASME, pp. 31-48, 1979.

M.J. O`Rourke, K. El Hmadi, Analysis of continuous buried pipelines for seismic wave effects. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 16, pp. 917-929, 1988.

M.J. O`Rourke, X. Liu, Response of buried pipelines subject to earthquake effects (Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), 1999).

H. Shah, S. Chu, Seismic Analysis of Underground Structural Elements, Journal of the Power Division, ASCE, July, Vol. 100, No. PO1, pp. 53-62, 1974.

E.C. Goodling, Buried piping – an analysis procedure update, Proceedings International Symposium on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Portland, Oregon, ASME, PVP-77, pp. 225-237,1983.

Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines, Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems (American Society of Civil Engineers, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, ASCE, 1984).

Y. Ogawa, T. Koike, Structural design of buried pipeline for sever earthquake, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 21, pp. 199-20, 2001.

P.M. Mclaughlin, M. O`Rourke, Seismic response and behavior of buried continuous piping systems containing elbows, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Civil. Eng., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute., 2003.

P. M. Mclaughlin, M. O`Rourke, Strain in pipe elbows due to wave propagation hazard, Lifeline Earthquake Engineering in a Multi hazard Environment, ASCE, pp. 382-392, 2009.

G.P. Kouretzisa, G.D. Bouckovalasa, C.J Gantes, 3-D shell analysis of cylindrical underground structures under seismic shear (S) wave action, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 26, pp. 909–921, 2006.

F.R. Rofooei, R. Qorbani, A Parametric Study on Seismic Behavior of Continues Buried Pipelines Due to wave Propagation, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 2008.

D.H. Lee, B.H. Kim, H. Lee, J.S. Kong, Seismic behavior of a buried gas pipeline under earthquake excitations, Engineering Structures, Vol. 3, pp. 1011-1023, 2009.

A.L. Rojas, Strong model for systems of pipes with different excitation in its supports, International Review of Civil Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 334-340, 2010.

M.A. El Azreq, A. El Hammoumi, A. Iben Brahim, A. El Mouraouah, M. Kerroum, K. Gueraoui, M. Kasmi, A. Birouk, Spectrum Response of Earthen Buildings, International Review of Civil Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 266-274, 2010.

Specification for Line Pipe (American Petroleum Institute (API), 2000).

J.E. Bowles, Foundation analysis and design (The McGraw-Hill Companies, 1996).

Guidelines for the design of buried steel Pipe (American Lifelines Alliance (ALA), 2001 (with addenda through 2005), American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE)).

Seismic Guidelines for Water Pipelines (American Lifelines Alliance (ALA), 2001 (with addenda through 2005)., American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE)).

A.I. Liu, Y.X. Hu, F.X. Zhao, X.J. Li, S. Takada, L. Zhao, An equivalent-boundary method for the shell analysis of buried pipelines under fault movement, ACTA SEISMOLOGICA SINICA, Vol. 17, pp. 150-156, 2004.

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER).


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Please send any question about this web site to
Copyright © 2005-2020 Praise Worthy Prize