Spectrum Response of Earthen Buildings


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


The seismic demand of a building is determined using a response spectrum which has the maximum response of a system of single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) based on its frequency. The Moroccan seismic regulations RPS2000 offers a spectrum of elastic acceleration for average stiff soil by considering a damping of 5% corresponding to structures made with materials considered by current standards (concrete, steel ...), but raw earth buildings are not part of this category of constructions and so we do not have tools to assess seismic demand and hence the seismic vulnerability of traditional structures. Our objective through this study is to develop a specific response spectrum Earthen raw deduced from RPS2008, established in order to assess their seismic vulnerability. This purpose we adopt two approaches, one experimental with graphical solution and the other theoretical with analytical verification. This approach allowed us to calculate an approximate value of reduced damping for adobe buildings and plot response spectra related.
Copyright © 2017 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Response Spectrum; Damping; Amplification; Stiffness; Frequency

Full Text:

PDF


References


D. Torrealva, J. Acero, Reinforcing adobe buildings with exterior compatible mesh. the final solution against the seismic vulnerability, External Compatible Reinforcement, 16-19P, 2007.

K. Lang, Seismic vulnerability of existing buildings, dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of technology Zurich for the degree of doctor of technical sciences 20-34, 41-55P, 2002.

RPS2008. Règlement de construction parasismique RPS2008, (applicable aux bâtiments). Ministère de l’aménagement du territoire, de l’urbanisme, de l’habitat et de l’environnement, Secrétariat d’Etat à l’Habitat 26, 30P.

Eurocode 8: Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures and national application document, partie 1-1, 14-15P.

Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures, partie 1-1, 60-64P.

Cherrabi, RPCT2008, Reglement Parasismique Des Constructions En Terre, (DRAFT), Direction des Equipements Publics, Ministère de l’Equipement et des Transports du Maroc, 16-23P, 39-44P.

Belmouden Y, Analyse spectrale non itérative des oscillateurs simples sous l’action des tremblements de terre , Bulletin de l’Institut Scientifique, Rabat, section Sciences de la Terre, 2004, n°26, 1-10. 3-4P, 2004.

F. Gantenbein, M. Livolant, V-2 amortissement , Génie parasismique, 366-367P.

D. Dubina, Simplified and Advanced Models for Calculation and Analysis of Masonry Shear Walls, Earthquake Protection Of Historical Buildings By Reversible Mixed Technologies, Wp9 – Calculation Models Roput 6P, 2006.

P. Deflandre, «V-10 Calcul de spectre de plancher. Méthodes utilisant le spectre de réponse,Génie parasismique, 449P.

C. Akitegetse, Approche Numérique et Expérimentale Pour L'Amélioration D'une Méthode de Mesure de la Force D'adhérence de la glace par L'Utilisation de Films Piézoélectriques,http://theses.uqac.ca/these_030007619.html, 88-90P, 2007.

N. Richard — L. Daudeville, M.Yasumura, Calcul dynamique de structures en bois fondé sur les comportements des assemblages, http://geo.hmg.inpg.fr/~daudevil/publis/RFGC4.pdf, 3P, 2002.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize