Seismic Design Evaluation of 10 Storeyed RC Building Using Nonlinear Analysis with Open Ground Storey Located in Medium Seismic Zone of India


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


In this paper authors have attempted to bring out the possible shortcomings in the analysis, design and seismic evaluation of commonly adopted OGS buildings in urban India and have suggested a suitable modelling strategy to be adopted in nonlinear analysis for satisfactory performance at demand earthquake. Nonlinear Time History (NTH) and Nonlinear Pushover Analysis (NSP) are performed on 10 storeyed OMRF RC building located in medium seismic zone designed as per IS codes for DBE. Three building models depicting the stiffness representation are analyzed and designed whereas nonlinear analyses (NSP and NTH) are performed considering four different scenarios depicting the lateral load pattern along the building height and plastic hinge properties for the frame elements and infills. The findings of the study reveals that the lateral forces obtained using response spectrum analysis and consideration of infill stiffness with additional walls in the corner bays of ground storey along with user defined hinges, will closely represent the actual behavior of the building at demand earthquake and thus will aid in better estimation of safety levels of OGS building. This is significant because open ground storey buildings are typically designed as bare frames and while carrying out nonlinear analysis equivalent static loads and default hinges are used for modeling lateral load and force deformation characteristics as a simple approach by the design engineer and this study concludes that this approach leads to severe underestimation of base shear and inaccurate calculation of performance levels. Results also show that NSP analysis overestimates the base shear by 20% and underestimates the roof displacements by 20 to 40%. As regards to the formation trend of plastic hinges, the results of both the analyses shows that the NSP analysis predict severe damage like CP and LS  in some of the frame elements while it shows non-conservative estimate of performance levels in other elements compared to the results obtained from NTH analysis.
Copyright © 2018 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Pushover Analysis; Performance Based Design; Seismic Evaluation; Infilled Structures

Full Text:

PDF


References


Applied Technology Council (ATC-40), (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, vols1–2. California.

Bureau of Indian standards (BIS) (2002), “Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1: general provisions for buildings,” IS 1893, fifth revision, New Delhi, India,

Bureau of Indian standards (BIS) (2000), “Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete “IS 456, New Delhi, India.

CSI ETABS Nonlinear Version 9.2.0 (1995), Extended three dimensional analysis of Building systems, Computers and structures Inc. Berkeley, CA, USA.

CSI ETABS Analysis reference manual (2005), Computers and structures Inc. Berkeley, CA, USA.

Das D. and Murty C.V.R. (2004), “Brick masonry infills in seismic design of RC framed buildings Part 2-Behaviour”, The Indian Concrete Journal, Vol.78, No.8, pp.31-38.

Davis R., Krishnan P., Menon D., and Prasad A (2004), “Effect of infill stiffness on seismic performance of multi-storey RC framed buildings in India”, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, paper no. 1198, Canada.

Elnashai A S (2001), “Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications”, Structural Engineering and mechanics, Vol.12, No.1, pp.51-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.12.1.051

Fajfar P (2000), “A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design”, .Earthquake Spectra, 16 (3):573–592.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA-356), (2000), “Prestandard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings” Washington.

Ghobarah A. (2001), “Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development”, Engineering Structures, 23, 878-884.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(01)00036-0

Ghaffarzadeh H., Talebian N., Kohande R. (2013), “Seismic demand evaluation of medium ductility RC moment Frames using nonlinear procedures”, Earthquake engineering and engineering vibration; 12:399–409.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0181-1

Hashmi A K. and Madan A. (2006), “Seismic performance of masonry infilled RC frames with open ground storey in India”, 13th Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, pp.695-703.

Inel M. and Ozmen H.B. (2006), “Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings”. Engineering Structures, 28:1494–502.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.017

Kalkan E. and Kunnath S. K. (2007), “Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings”, Engineering Structures, Vol.29, pp.305-316.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.012

Kanitkar R. and Kanitkar V. (2004), “Seismic performance of conventional multi-storey buildings with open ground storey for vehicular parking”, Indian Concrete Journal, Vol.78, No.2, pp.99-104.

Kaushik H. B., Rai D. C., and Jain S. K. (2007), “Stress-strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial compression”, Current science, Vol. 92, No.4, pp. 497-501.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2007)19:9(728)

Kaushik H., Rai D. and Jain S.K. (2009), “Effectiveness of Some Strengthening Options for Masonry–Infilled RC Frames with Open First story”, Journal of structural Engineering, ASCE, 135:925-937.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2009)135:8(925)

Kumar A. (2004), “software for generation of spectrum compatible time history”, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada.

Lee H S. and Woo W S. (2002), “Effect of masonry infills on seismic performance of a 3-storey RC frame with non-seismic detailing”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.31, pp.353-378.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.112

Panandikar N. and Narayan B. (2015), “Sensitivity of pushover curve to material and geometric modelling-An overview”, Engineering Structures, 2352-0124, pp. 91-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.02.004

Murty C.V. R. and Jain S.K., (2000), “Beneficial Influence of Masonry Infill Wallson Seismic Performance of RC Frame Buildings”, Department of Civil Engineer, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.

Naik P. and Annigeri S, (2016), “Moment Curvature Analysis of RC columns as per IS 456:2000”, Bonfring International Journal of Man Machine Interface, Vol. 4, special issue, July 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.9756/bijmmi.8147

Stafford Smith B., (1962), “Lateral Stiffness of Infilled Frames”, Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, Vol.88, No. ST6, pp. 183-199.

Varadharajan S. (2014), “Study of Irregular RC building under seismic effect”, Ph.D. Thesis, National Institute of Technology.

Zameeruddhin M. and Sangle K.K.(2016), “Review on recent developments in performance-based seismic design of reinforced concrete structures”, Structures 6, pp. 119-113.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.03.001


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize