Effect of Steel Jacketing on Seismic Vulnerability of Pile-Supported Wharves


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


Pile-supported wharf structures are a common type of berthing facilities in seaports which have exhibited considerable vulnerabilities to moderate to strong ground motions. Considering the undeniable role of pile-supported wharves on the effective performance of seaports and hence world's economy, seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofit of these vital structures is a key issue. In this paper, effect of steel jacketing, as a retrofit measure, on the seismic vulnerability of a typical pile supported wharf is investigated. The seismic vulnerability of structures is usually expressed in the form of fragility curves. These curves show the probability of exceeding a damage from a predefined damage state under a suit of ground motions. In addition, these curves provide a helpful tool for evaluating the effect of retrofit measures on the seismic performance of structures under a wide range of seismic loading levels. In this paper, detailed three dimensional models of a pile supported wharf including the as-built and retrofitted wharf are constructed. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is performed using eight ground motion records to study nonlinear dynamic responses of the wharf. Then, based on the seismic responses and predefined damage states, the fragility curves of the as-built and retrofitted wharf are established. Finally, the efficiency of the retrofit technique on the seismic response of the structure is evaluated by comparing the fragility curves before and after the retrofit. It is observed that the level of damage probability for the retrofitted wharf is less than that of the as-built one for all level of seismic excitations. This paper can help decision makers to compare the results of steel jacketing method with another methods and select suitable retrofit technique for pile supported wharves.
Copyright © 2015 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Fragility Curves; Incremental Dynamic Analysis; Pile-Supported Wharf; Seismic Retrofit; Steel Jacketing

Full Text:

PDF


References


S. D. Werner, Seismic guidelines for ports (ASCE Publications, 1998), New York.

R. E. Kayen, J. K. Mitchell, R. B. Seed, and S. y. Nishio, Soil liquefaction in the east bay during the earthquake, The Loma Prieta, California Earthquake of October, 17, 1989—Liquefaction, Professional Paper No. 1551-B, pp. 61-86, 1998.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5034-7_9

A. Shafieezadeh, R. DesRoches, G. J. Rix, and S. D. Werner, Seismic Performance of Pile-Supported Wharf Structures Considering Soil-Structure Interaction in Liquefied Soil, Earthquake Spectra, vol. 28, 2012, pp. 729-757.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.4000008

J.-S. Chiou, C.-H. Chiang, H.-H. Yang, and S.-Y. Hsu, Developing fragility curves for a pile-supported wharf, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 31, 2011, pp. 830-840.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.01.011

C.-S. W. Yang, R. DesRoches, and G. J. Rix, Numerical fragility analysis of vertical-pile-supported wharves in the western United States, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 16, 2012, pp. 579-594.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.641063

H. Heidary-Torkamani, K. Bargi, R. Amirabadi, and N. J. McCllough, Fragility estimation and sensitivity analysis of an idealized pile-supported wharf with batter piles, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 61–62, 2014, pp. 92-106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.01.024

C. Thomopoulos and C. Lai, Preliminary definition of fragility curves for pile-supported wharves, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 16, 2012, pp. 83-106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.675839

A.Banayan-Kermani, K. Bargi, H. Heidary-Torkamani, Seismic performance assessment of pile-supported wharves retrofitted by carbon fibre–reinforced polymer composite considering ageing effect, Advances in Structural Engineering, vol. 19, 2016, pp. 581-598.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1369433216630187

K. R. Karim and F. Yamazaki, Effect of isolation on fragility curves of highway bridges based on simplified approach, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 27, 2007,pp. 414-426.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.10.006

A. Ghobarah and H. M. Ali, Seismic performance of highway bridges, Engineering Structures, vol. 10, 1988, pp. 157-166.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(88)90002-8

E. Choi and J.-C. Jeon, Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zone, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 7, 2003, pp. 41-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02841989

F. Casciati, G. P. Cimellaro, and M. Domaneschi, Seismic reliability of a cable-stayed bridge retrofitted with hysteretic devices, Computers & Structures, vol. 86, 2008, pp. 1769-1781.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.01.012

M. D. Martínez-Rodrigo, J. Lavado, and P. Museros, Dynamic performance of existing high-speed railway bridges under resonant conditions retrofitted with fluid viscous dampers, Engineering Structures, vol. 32, 2010, pp. 808-828.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.008

P. Jeff Kilborn, P. Robert Harn, and Y. Firat, Seismic retrofit of piers supported on battered piles using lead-rubber bearings, 12th Triannual International Conference on Ports, 2010 , Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41098(368)8

S. A. Mousavi and K. Bargi, Enhancing Seismic Capacity of Pile-Supported Wharves Using Yielding Dampers, Journal of Structures, vol. 2013, 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/329130

M. Shinozuka, S.-H. Kim, S. Kushiyama, and J.-H. Yi, Fragility curves of concrete bridges retrofitted by column jacketing, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, vol. 1, 2002, pp. 195-205.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11803-002-0065-2

Y. Zhang, W. Cofer, and D. McLean, Analytical Evaluation of Retrofit Strategies for Multicolumn Bridges, Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 4, 1999, pp. 143-150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(1999)4:2(143)

J. E. Padgett and R. DesRoches, Retrofitted Bridge Fragility Analysis for Typical Classes of Multispan Bridges, Earthquake Spectra, vol. 25, 2009, pp. 117-141.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.3049405

B. P. Reddy, P. Alagusundaramoorthy, and R. Sundaravadivelu, Retrofitting of RC piles using GFRP composites, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, 2009, pp. 39-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12205-009-0039-2

Y. S. Chung, D. H. Lee, C. K. Park, and J. Y. Park, Seismic enhancement of circular RC bridge piers with fiber composites, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 6, 2002, pp. 485-493.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02842002

Ioan Gergely, C. P. Pantelides, Ralph J. Nuismer, and L. D. Reaveley, Bridge Pier Retrofit Using Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Composites, Journal of Composites for Construction, vol. 2, 1998, pp. 165-174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(1998)2:4(165)

J. Mander, M. Priestley, and R. Park, Observed stress-strain behavior of confined concrete, Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 114, 1988, pp. 1827-1849.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1827)

Y. H. ChaiI, M. N. Priestley, and F. Seible, Seismic retrofit of circular bridge columns for enhanced flexural performance, ACI Structural Journal, vol. 88, 1991.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14359/2759

M. N. Priestley, Seismic design and retrofit of bridges (John Wiley & Sons, 1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470172858

SAP2000: static and dynamic finite element analysis of structures, ed. Berkeley, California: Computers and Structures, Inc 2010.

G. S. Wang, F.-K. Huang, and C.-L. Huang, Seismic Fragility Analysis Framework for Pile-supported Wharf, in The Twenty-first International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 2011, Maui, Hindawii, USA.

M. J. Donahue, S. E. Dickenson, T. H. Miller, and S. C. Yim, Implications of the observed seismic performance of a pile-supported wharf for numerical modeling, Earthquake spectra, vol. 21, 2005, pp. 617-634.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1978887

Recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing offshore platforms, American Petroleum Institute, Washington , D.C.1987.

J.-S. Chiou, H.-H. Yang, and C.-H. Chen, Use of plastic hinge model in nonlinear pushover analysis of a pile, Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, vol. 135, 2009, pp. 1341-1346.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000015

O. Yu, D. L. Allen, and V. P. Drnevich, Seismic vulnerability assessment of bridges on earthquake priority routes in Western Kentucky, in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering (1991), 1991, pp. 817-826.

H. Hwang, J. B. Jernigan, and Y.-W. Lin, Evaluation of seismic damage to Memphis bridges and highway systems, Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 5, 2000, pp. 322-330.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2000)5:4(322)

S.-H. Jeong and A. S. Elnashai, Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities, Engineering Structures, vol. 29, 2007, pp. 1238-1251.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.026

S. Banerjee and M. Shinozuka, Nonlinear Static Procedure for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Bridges, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 22, 2007, pp. 293-305.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00486.x

H. Heidary-Torkamani, K. Bargi, and R. Amirabadi, Seismic vulnerability assessment of pile-supported wharves using fragility curves, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 10, 2013, pp. 1417-1431.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.823453

H. Heidary Torkamani, K. Bargi, and R. Amirabadi, Fragility Curves Derivation for a Pile-Supported Wharf, Journal of Marine Engineering, vol. 1, 2013, pp. 1-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.823453

N. Shome, C. A. Cornell, P. Bazzurro, and J. E. Carballo, Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses, Earthquake Spectra, vol. 14, 1998, pp. 469-500.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1586011

J. Bommer, A. Acevedo, and J. Douglas, The selection and scaling of real earthquake accelerograms for use in seismic design and assessment, Proceedings of ACI International Conference on Seismic Bridge Design and Retrofit, American Concrete Institute, 2003.

D. Vamvatsikos and C. A. Cornell, Incremental dynamic analysis, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, 2002, pp. 491-514.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141

U. J. Na, S. R. Chaudhuri, and M. Shinozuka, "Performance evaluation of pilesupported wharf under seismic loading," TCLEE 2009: Lifeline Earthquake Engineering in a Multihazard Environment, 2009, Oakland, California, United States.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41050(357)98

S. M. Lee, T. J. Kim, and S. L. Kang, Development of fragility curves for bridges in Korea, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 11, 2007, pp. 165-174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02823897

M. Shinozuka, M. Feng, J. Lee, and T. Naganuma, Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 126, 2000, pp. 1224-1231.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)

T. Nakamura and M. Shinozuka, A study on failure probability of highway bridges by earthquake based on statistical method, Proceedings of the 10th Japanese Earthquake Engineering Symposium, 1998.

W. H. Chong and T. Soong, Sliding fragility of unrestrained equipment in critical facilities, in Technical Report MCEER, ed: US Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), 2000.

E. M. MOSTAFA, Fragility curves for non-structural systems, Technical report 99-2, school of civil engineering, Cornell university, Ithaka, New York, 1999.

F. E. M. A. (FEMA), HAZUS 99 estimated annualized earthquake losses for the united states, 2000.

R. Amirabadi, K. Bargi, M. Dolatshahi Piroz, H. Heidary Torkamani, and N. McCullough, Determination of optimal probabilistic seismic demand models for pile-supported wharves, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 10, 2013, pp. 1119-1145.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.793723

Seismic design guidelines for port structures, International Navigation Association (PIANC), 2001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/noe9026518188


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize