Effect of Bedrock Depth on Site Amplification: A Parametric Study for Different Soil Types
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)
One of the most important parameters that determine the effect of local site condition on strong ground motion is the location of bedrock and its geomorphology. The depth of bedrock alters the dynamics of the system as a whole and thus has significant influence on amplification of the bedrock motion. The present study is an attempt to investigate the effect of bedrock depth on site amplification through the perspective of one dimensional ground response analysis. The study is extended to all three soil types of Indian peninsula in accordance with IS 1893 (Part I): 2002. Four earthquakes are considered to simulate near field and far field effects. Results are interpreted in terms of surface acceleration time history, response spectra at 5%, 10%, 15%& 20% damping, amplification spectrum and Fourier spectra at the surface. It has been observed that amplification of bedrock motion is a function of frequency content of the input motion and is closely correlated to bed rock depth. The study also reveals that peak ground acceleration for all soil types’ changes with the depth of bed rock.
Copyright © 2015 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.
MacMurdo, J. (1824). "Papers related to earthquake which occurred in India in 1819". Philosophical Magazine.63, 105- 177.
Mallet, R. (1862). "Great Neapolitan earthquake of 1857". London, 2.
Wood, H.O. (1908). "Distribution of apparent intensity in San Francisco, in California earthquake of April 18, 1906". Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission. 1, 220-245.
Aki, K. (1988). "Local site effects on strong ground motion". Proc. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II, Park City, Utah, 103–155.
Borcherdt, R.D. and Glassmoyer, G. (1994). “Influences of local geology on strong and weak ground motions recorded in the San Francisco Bay region and their implications for site-specific building-code provisions The Loma Prieta, California Earthquake of October 17, 1989-Strong Ground Motion.” U.S. Geol. Surv. Profess. Pap.,1551- A, A77-A108.
Finn, W.D.L. (1991). "Geotechnical engineering aspects of microzonation". Proc. 4th International Conference on Microzonation, California, 1, 199- 259.
Boore, D.M. (2004). "Can site response be predicted.” Journal of earthquake Engineering, 8, Sp. Issue 1, 1-41.
Trifunac, M.D. and Hudson, D.E. (1971). "Analysis of Pacoima Dam accelerograms- San Fernando Earthquake of 1971". Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 61(5), 1393- 1411.
Idriss, I. M. (1990). “Response of Soft Soil Sites During Earthquakes.” Proc. Memorial Symposium to Honor Professor H .B . Seed, Berkeley, California.
King, J. and Tucker, B. (1984), “Observed variations of earthquake motion across a sediment-filled valley.” Bull. Seis. Soc. Am.,74, 137–151.
Boore, D.M. (2004). “Estimating Vs (30) (or NEHRP Site Classes) from shallow velocity models (Depths < 30 m).” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94 (2), 591- 597.
Anbazhagan, P., Sheikh, M.N., and Parihar, A. (2013). "Influence of rock depth on seismic site classification for shallow bedrock regions." Natural Hazards Review, 14 (2), 108-121.
Nath, R. R., Jakka, R.S. (2012). “Effect of Bedrock Depth on Site Classification.” Proc. Of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 1-9.
Boominathan, A., Dodagoudar, R., Suganthi, A., and Maheswari, R.U. (2007). "Seismichazardassessmentconsidering local site effects for microzonationstudies of Chennai city." Proc. of the workshop on microzonation, IISc Bangalore, 1, 94–104.
Choudhury, D. and Shukla, J. (2011). "Probability of occurrence and study of earthquakerecurrencemodels for Gujarat state in India". DisasterAdv, 4(2), 47–59.
GovindaRaju, L., Ramana, G.V., HanumantaRao, C., and Sitharam, T.G. (2004).‘ Site specific ground response analysis.’CurrSci 87(10):1354–1362.
Mohanty, W.K., Walling, M.Y., Nath, S.K, and Pal, I. (2007). ‘First order seismic microzonation of Delhi, India using geographic information system (GIS).’ Nat Hazards 40:245–260.
Phanikanth, V. S., Choudhury, D. and Reddy, G. R. (2011). “Equivalent seismic ground response analysis for some typical sites in Mumbai.” GeotechGeolEng (2011), 29: 1109- 1126.
Raghukanth, S.T.G., Sreelatha, S., and Dash, S.K. (2008). ‘Ground motion estimation at Guwahati city for an Mw 8.1 earthquake in the Shillong plateau.’ Tectonophysics, 448(1–4):98–114.
Ranjan, R. (2005). ‘Site response analysis of Dehradun city.’ M.S. Thesis submitted to the international institute for geo-information science and earth observation, India.
IS 1893-1 (2002). "Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures". Bureau of Indian Standard.
Idriss, I.M. and Sun, J.I. (1992). “User's Manual for SHAKE91”. Davis: Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Please send any question about this web site to email@example.com
Copyright © 2005-2021 Praise Worthy Prize