Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Rectal Exploration: its Importance in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


This paper deals with the importance of rectal exploration in order to diagnose a possible prostate cancer. This article describes in details the correct procedure of rectal exploration, its preeminent importance in discovering diseases and every possible how is possible to hypothesize some disease through this exploration. For this reason, a correct rectal exploration is considered as the fastest way to identify prostate cancer (or any kind of disease), before making any other examination; actually it should be regularly done even in absence of symptoms. The rectal exploration (RE) must constitute the first diagnostic approach to the patient that presents symptoms referable to a possible prostatic pathology. Given that prostate cancer occurs in more than 70% of cases at the peripheral portion of the gland, the neoplastic nodule can often be detected already with the simple palpation. In particular, this is easier when the lesion has a volume of 0.2 mL or greater. About 18% of prostatic neoplasms are detected by rectal exploration alone, regardless of PSA values. A suspected palpatory to the RE, associated with a PSA>2ng/ml, presents a positive predictive value between 5 and 30%. An at least "dubious" RE is also associated with an increased risk of disease with a high Gleason score and therefore leads to taking into account the execution of post-operative biopsy. However, the RE, although indispensable in the evaluation of the patient, cannot be used singularly as the only diagnostic method, as it presents low levels of sensitivity (positive predictive value), and specificity. In large series of patients it has been shown that the ER fails the diagnosis of cancer in about half of the cases, as there is no demonstrated correspondence between a palpatory alteration and the presence of tumor.
Copyright © 2019 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Rectal Exploration; Prostate Cancer; Prevention; Diagnosis

Full Text:

PDF


References


Seehusen DA. Pelvic examination. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1778-9.

Zanollo A, Beretta G, et al. Anamnestic criteria for sexual evaluation in the andrological field. Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl. 1991; 63(4):493-7.

Beretta G . Sexual Problems and Infertility. In Clinical Management of Male Infertility . G. Cavallini, G. Beretta. Springer International Publishing Switzerland (eds.), 2014.

Nickel JC et al 2010 Update: Guidelines for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia Can Urol Assoc J. 2010; 4: 310–316

Reilly BM Physical examination in the care of medical inpatients: an observational study. Lancet. 2003:4;362 (9390):1100-5.

Chiu S et al Reasons for delays in diagnosis of anal cancer and the effect on patient satisfaction Can Fam Physician November 2015 61:e509-e516.

Walsh AL Digital rectal examination in primary care is important for early detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis study. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64e783-7.

Little P et al. Importance of patient pressure and perceived medical need for investigations, referral, and prescribing in primary care: nested observational study. BMJ 2004; 328:444-6.

Carvalhal GF, Smith DS, Mager DE, Ramos C, Catalona WJ. Digital rectal examination for detecting prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levels of 4 ng./ml. or less. J Urol 1999; 161(3): 835-9.

Okotie OT, Roehl KA, Han M, Loeb S, Gashti SN, Catalona WJ. Characteristics of prostate cancer detected by digital rectal examination only. Urology 2007; 70(6): 1117-20.

Mettlin C, Lee F, Drago J, Murphy GP. The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men. Cancer 1991; 67(12): 2949-58.

1989 survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin 1990; 40(2): 77-101.





Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize