Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Buildings Optimal Insulation Thickness Effects on Air Conditioning Capacity and PV Self-Consumption Share Level


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/irecon.v9i2.19859

Abstract


Energy conservation projects and renewable energy power generation are the future of sustainable energy supply. Combining both is very effective and maximizes benefits. PTs building sector is the highest consumer, constitute 48.6% of the total Palestinian energy balance. Until now, there is no specific Palestinian engineering building code. As a result, building insulation is still mandatory. There are few performed studies about optimal building insulation thickness economic and environmental benefits. Regarding renewable energy national share increase, the PA developed many ambitious plans, most of which concentrated on increasing PV systems installed capacity due to its high potential. PTs enjoy 3000 sunshine hours per year, 5.4 kWh/m2/day average solar radiation. Few studies are targeting Palestinian building's renewable energy share increase through the principle of self-consumption. This research presents a novel approach in investigating the economic feasibility of installing optimal insulation thickness in buildings. Practically, insulation layers are assumed to be installed during the building phase, before mechanical building systems. However, the insulation effect will reduce AC required capacity as a result of reducing summer CL, thus, reduce initial investment. For that reason, the P1-P2 method has been used to generalize the optimal insulation thickness approach for the West Bank area considering different Tb values. It has been found that at Tb=18 °C, optimal thickness values, total cost, energy saved, and Np values are 10-11 cm, 18 $/m2, 175-375 $/m2, and 5-14 years, respectively. Then, a commercial building in Ramallah city was taken as a case study; it has a 1,700m2 roof area for PV installation. PVsyst software is used to design a 173 kWp system. It is estimated to generate 320MWh per year for building self-consumption. The insulation effect raised renewable energy share from 62.6% to 64.1%, and reduced AC rated capacity by 20 refrigeration ton (saved $20,000 as an initial investment).
Copyright © 2021 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Life Cycle Costing; Optimal Insulation Thickness; Buildings Cooling Loads; Photovoltaic; Renewable Energy; CO2-eq

Full Text:

PDF


References


P.C.B. of Statistics, No TitleFinal Energy Consumption by Sector and Type of energy and Year, 2014-2018, (2018).

Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, EnergyBalance of Palestine in Terajoul, 2018, (2018).

Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, Selected energy Performance Indicators in Palestine, 2014-2018, (2018).

DCENR, National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2014, (2013) 16–18.
http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/energy/SiteCollectionDocuments/Energy-Efficiency/NEEAP 3.pdf

M. Baba, S. Monna, S. Alqadi, Palestinian Green Buildings Guidelines, (2013).

S. of Palestine, Statte of Palestine Nationally Determined Contributions / United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Summary for Policy Makers, (n.d.) 1–8.

A. Juaidi, F.G. Montoya, I.H. Ibrik, F. Manzano-agugliaro, An overview of renewable energy potential in Palestine An overview of renewable energy potential in Palestine, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 65 (2016) 943–960.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.052

T. Abu Hamed, H. Flamm, M. Azraq, Renewable energy in the Palestinian Territories: Opportunities and challenges, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 (2012) 1082–1088.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.10.011

A. Boodi, K. Beddiar, Y. Amirat, M. Benbouzid, Simplified building thermal model development and parameters evaluation using a stochastic approach, Energies. 13 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112899

M.F. Alsayed, R.A. Tayeh, Life cycle cost analysis for determining optimal insulation thickness in Palestinian buildings, J. Build. Eng. 22 (2019) 101–112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.11.018

A. Bolattürk, Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with respect to various fuels and climate zones in Turkey, Appl. Therm. Eng. 26 (2006) 1301–1309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.10.019

N. Sisman, E. Kahya, N. Aras, H. Aras, Determination of optimum insulation thicknesses of the external walls and roof (ceiling) for Turkey’s different degree-day regions, Energy Policy. 35 (2007) 5151–5155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.037

D. D’Agostino, F. de’ Rossi, M. Marigliano, C. Marino, F. Minichiello, Evaluation of the optimal thermal insulation thickness for an office building in different climates by means of the basic and modified “cost-optimal” methodology, J. Build. Eng. 24 (2019) 100743.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100743

J. Yu, C. Yang, L. Tian, D. Liao, A study on optimum insulation thicknesses of external walls in hot summer and cold winter zone of China, Appl. Energy. 86 (2009) 2520–2529.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.010

A. Ucar, F. Balo, Determination of the energy savings and the optimum insulation thickness in the four different insulated exterior walls, Renew. Energy. 35 (2010) 88–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.07.009

N. Daouas, Z. Hassen, H. Ben Aissia, Analytical periodic solution for the study of thermal performance and optimum insulation thickness of building walls in Tunisia, Appl. Therm. Eng. 30 (2010) 319–326.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2009.09.009

M.K. Nematchoua, C.R.R. Raminosoa, R. Mamiharijaona, T. René, J.A. Orosa, W. Elvis, P. Meukam, Study of the economical and optimum thermal insulation thickness for buildings in a wet and hot tropical climate: Case of Cameroon, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 50 (2015) 1192–1202.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.066

B.M. Ziapour, M. Rahimi, M. Yousefi Gendeshmin, Thermoeconomic analysis for determining optimal insulation thickness for new composite prefabricated wall block as an external wall member in buildings, J. Build. Eng. 31 (2020) 101354.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101354

M. Dlimi, O. Iken, R. Agounoun, A. Zoubir, I. Kadiri, K. Sbai, Energy performance and thickness optimization of hemp wool insulation and air cavity layers integrated in Moroccan building walls’, Sustain. Prod. Consum. 20 (2019) 273–288.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.07.008

O. Kaynakli, A review of the economical and optimum thermal insulation thickness for building applications, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 (2012) 415–425.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.006

X. Liu, Y. Chen, H. Ge, P. Fazio, G. Chen, X. Guo, Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with moisture transfer in hot summer and cold winter zone of China, Energy Build. 109 (2015) 361–368.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.021

M. Ashouri, F.R. Astaraei, R. Ghasempour, M.H. Ahmadi, M. Feidt, Optimum insulation thickness determination of a building wall using exergetic life cycle assessment, Appl. Therm. Eng. 106 (2016) 307–315.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.190

R. Kunič, Carbon footprint of thermal insulation materials in building envelopes, Energy Effic. 10 (2017) 1511–1528.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9536-1

D. Anastaselos, S. Oxizidis, A.M. Papadopoulos, Suitable thermal insulation solutions for Mediterranean climatic conditions: a case study for four Greek cities, Energy Effic. 10 (2017) 1081–1098.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9504-1

W.A. Friess, K. Rakhshan, M.P. Davis, A global survey of adverse energetic effects of increased wall insulation in office buildings: degree day and climate zone indicators, Energy Effic. 10 (2017) 97–116.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9441-z

Ö.A. Dombayci, The environmental impact of optimum insulation thickness for external walls of buildings, Build. Environ. 42 (2007) 3855–3859.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.054

T.M.I. Mahlia, A. Iqbal, Cost benefits analysis and emission reductions of optimum thickness and air gaps for selected insulation materials for building walls in Maldives, Energy. 35 (2010) 2242–2250.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.011

H. Huang, Y. Zhou, R. Huang, H. Wu, Y. Sun, G. Huang, T. Xu, Optimum insulation thicknesses and energy conservation of building thermal insulation materials in Chinese zone of humid subtropical climate, Sustain. Cities Soc. 52 (2020) 101840..
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101840

E. Amiri Rad, E. Fallahi, Optimizing the insulation thickness of external wall by a novel 3E (energy, environmental, economic) method, Constr. Build. Mater. 205 (2019) 196–212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.006

A. Boodi, K. Beddiar, M. Benamour, Y. Amirat, M. Benbouzid, Intelligent systems for building energy and occupant comfort optimization: A state of the art review and recommendations, Energies. 11 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102604

K. Kalhor, N. Emaminejad, Qualitative and quantitative optimization of thermal insulation materials: Insights from the market and energy codes, J. Build. Eng. 30 (2020) 101275..
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101275

J. Dehler, D. Keles, T. Telsnig, B. Fleischer, M. Baumann, D. Fraboulet, A. Faure-Schuyer, W. Fichtner, Self-Consumption of Electricity from Renewable Sources, Eur. Energy Transit. Insights Policy Mak. (2017) 225–236.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809806-6.00027-4

R. Luthander, J. Widén, D. Nilsson, J. Palm, Photovoltaic self-consumption in buildings: A review, Appl. Energy. 142 (2015) 80–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.028

W.J.N. Turner, I.S. Walker, J. Roux, Peak load reductions: Electric load shifting with mechanical pre-cooling of residential buildings with low thermal mass, Energy. 82 (2015) 1057–1067.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.011

J.C. Solano, L. Olivieri, E. Caamaño-Martín, Assessing the potential of PV hybrid systems to cover HVAC loads in a grid-connected residential building through intelligent control, Appl. Energy. 206 (2017) 249–266.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.188

A.K. Shukla, K. Sudhakar, P. Baredar, Recent advancement in BIPV product technologies: A review, Energy Build. 140 (2017) 188–195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.015

E. Biyik, M. Araz, A. Hepbasli, M. Shahrestani, R. Yao, L. Shao, E. Essah, A.C. Oliveira, T. del Caño, E. Rico, J.L. Lechón, L. Andrade, A. Mendes, Y.B. Atlı, A key review of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems, Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J. 20 (2017) 833–858.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2017.01.009

A. Bolattürk, Optimum insulation thicknesses for building walls with respect to cooling and heating degree-hours in the warmest zone of Turkey, Build. Environ. 43 (2008) 1055–1064.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.02.014

W. Duffie, Jona. Beckmann, Solar Engineering of thermal Processes, 3rd editio, John Wiley and Sons, 2006.

S.R.D. (SoDa), Solar energy Services for Professionals, (n.d.) accessed July 1, 2020.
http://www.soda-pro.com/web-services#radiation

Clean Energy Council, Grid Connected Solar PV Systems (No Batttery Storage): Design Guidelines for Accredited Installers, (2013) 0–18.
https://www.solaraccreditation.com.au/dam/solar-accred/installers/becoming-accredited/CEC-Accreditation-Design-Guidelines-Feb-2013.pdf

Ministry of Trsansport, Climate Bulletin, Palest. Metrol. Dep. (2020) (accessed March 7, 2020).
http://www.pmd.ps/loadElementMean.do

OECD, Israel Policy Brief, Oecd. (2016) 2.
www.oecd.org/israel


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize