Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

GIS-Based Rainfall-Runoff Neuro Model for Streamflow Prediction


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/irece.v8i5.12104

Abstract


TOPMODEL is a semi-distributed rainfall runoff model that has been widely used in numerous water resources’ applications in the last few decades. However, literature has identified the weakness in the TOPMODEL performances in streamflow prediction. In this paper, a multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP-NN) has been adopted to improve the accuracy of streamflow prediction in a flash flood in Pinang catchment area. Two daily hydro-meteorological datasets of year 2007-2008 and 2009-2010 were used for calibration and validation periods, respectively. The new method presented in this study uses the TOPMODEL input-output datasets during the calibration period to train the MLP-NN to predict the output. Then, the trained MLP-NN model structure is used to predict the streamflow based on validation period datasets. The three efficiencies considered to evaluate the model performances are the Nash-Sutcliffe model (NS), the Relative Volume Error (RVE) and the Correlation Coefficient (CoC). The results indicated an improvement from 0.749, -19.2 and 0.893 of NS, RVE and CoC of the calibration period to 0.978, 0.364 and 0.989, respectively. Moreover, for the validation periods, the performance has been improved from 0.774, -19.84 and 0.933 of NS, RVE and CoC to 0.975, -0.029 and 0.789, respectively. The ability of MLP-NN to improve TOPMODEL daily streamflow prediction has been demonstrated in this study.
Copyright © 2017 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Flash Flood Tropical Area; Penang Island; TOPMODEL; Multilayer Perceptron; Streamflow Prediction

Full Text:

PDF


References


J. Chen, B. J. Adams, Integration of artificial neural networks with conceptual models in rainfall-runoff modeling, J. Hydrol., 318, 232–249, 2006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.017

A. Güntner, S. Uhlenbrook, J. Seibert and C. Leibundgut, Multi-criterial validation of TOPMODEL in a mountainous catchment, Hydrol. Processes, 13(11): 1603-1620, 1999.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(19990815)13:11%3C1603::aid-hyp830%3E3.0.co;2-k

B. M. Mutua and A. Klik, Predicting daily streamflow in ungauged rural catchments the case of Masinga catchment Kenya, Hydrological Sciences Journal 52: 292-304, 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.2.292

A.H.A. Suliman, A. Katimon, I. Z. Mat Darus, S. Shahid, Comparison of Semi Distributed, GIS-Based Hydrological Models for the Prediction of Streamflow in a Large Catchment, Water Resour Manag. 30(9):3159-3173, 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0984-0

A.H.A. Suliman, A. Katimon, I. Z. Mat Darus, Semi-distributed Rainfall-runoff Modeling utilizing ASTER DEM in Pinang Catchment of Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana, 43(9): 1379-1388, 2014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1338-2

Y. Chen, D. Zhu, J. Zhao, Small basin flash flood simulation with TOPMODEL. GIS and Remote Sensing in Hydrology, Water Resources and Environment, 289, 41–49, 2003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.08.007

K. J. Beven, R. Lamb, P. F. Quinn, R. Romanowicz, J. Freer, TOPMODEL. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Singh VP (ed.). Water Resources Publications: 627–668, 1995.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.037

N. A. Chappell, S. W. Franks, J. Larenus, Multi-scale permeability estimation for a tropical catchment, Hydrol. Process. 12, 1507–1523, 1998.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(199807)12:9%3C1507::aid-hyp653%3E3.0.co;2-j

O Kişi, River flow modeling using artificial neural networks, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 9, 60-63, 2004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2004)9:1(60)

P. Campling, A. Gobin, K. Beven, J. Feyen, Rainfall-runoff modelling of a humid tropical catchment: the TOPMODEL approach, Hydrol. Process.16, 231–253, 2002.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.341

K. W Kang, J. H. Kim, C. Y. Park, K. J. Ham, Evaluation of hydrological forecasting system based on neural network model, Proc. 25th Congress of Int. Assoc. for Hydr. Res. International Association for Hydraulic Research, Delft, the Netherlands, 257 – 264, 1993.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icnc.2011.6022232

P. F. Quinn, K. J. Beven, P. Chevallier, O. Planchon, The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrological Processes 5: 59–79, 1991.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050106

M. A. Antar, I. Elassiouti, M. N. Allam, Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks technique: a Blue Nile catchment case study, Hydrological Process, 20, 1201 – 1216, 2006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5932

V. Singh, D. Woolhiser, Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 7, 270–292, 2002.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2002)7:4(270)

X Lihua, M Kieran, G. Monomoy, Application of the artificial neural network (ANN) in flood forecasting on a karstic catchment, In XXIX IAHR Congress Proceedings, 2001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ijcnn.2006.1716604

Arslan, C., Improved Un-Gauged Streamflow Prediction Using Three Artificial Neural Networks Methods for Leeser Zab, (2013) International Review of Civil Engineering (IRECE), 4 (5), pp. 277-283.

M. R. Gautam, K. Watanabe, H. Saegusa, Runoff Analysis in Humid Forest Catchment with Artificial Neural Networks, Journal of Hydrology, 235, 117-136, 2000.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00268-7

Nugroho, A., Sulistyo, W., Water Resource Conservation Model-Based Multivariate Time Series Method and Fuzzy Logic Using Climatology and Hydrology Data, (2016) International Journal on Numerical and Analytical Methods in Engineering (IRENA), 4 (3), pp. 65-71.

A.Y. Shamseldin, Application of a neural network technique to rainfall–runoff modelling, Journal of Hydrology, 199, 272–294, 1997.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03330-6

A. P. S Kumar, K. P. Sudheer, S. K Jain, P. K. Agarwal, Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks: comparison of network types, Hydrological Processes, 19, 1277–1291, 2005.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5581

J. D. Garbrecht, Comparison of three alternative ann designs for monthly rainfall-runoff simultation, Journal Hydrologic Engineering, 11, 502-505, 2006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2006)11:5(502)

L. E. Besaw, D. M. Rizzo, P. R. Bierman, W. R. Hackett, Advances in ungauged streamflow prediction using artificial neural networks, Journal of Hydrology, 386, 27 – 37, 2010.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.037

K. J. Beven, M. J. Kirkby, N. Schofield, A. F. Tagg, Testing a physically-based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three U.K. catchments, Journal of Hydrology, 69, 119–143, 1984.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(84)90159-8

K. J. Beven, Distributed Hydrological Modelling: Applications of the Topmodel Concept, Wiley: Chichester 1997.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(199707)11:9%3C1069::aid-hyp545%3E3.0.co;2-o

J. E. Nash, J. V. Sutcliffe, River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol. 10, 282–290, 1970.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6

P. H. M. Janssen, P.S.C. Heuberger, Calibration of process-oriented models, Ecol. Model. 83 (1–2), 55–66, 1995.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(95)00084-9


Refbacks




Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize