Effect of the Silt and Clay Fractions on the Liquid Limit Measurements by Atterberg Cup and Fall Cone Penetrometer


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


There are two widely used methods to determine the liquid limit of a soil; the Atterberg cup according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the fall cone penetrometer according to the British Standards (BS). It appeared that the fall cone test is more reliable than the Atterberg test and therefore it is important to make this comparison. First of all, we collected twenty-nine samples from the Lebanese territory in order to identify them through many laboratory experiments such as the sieve analysis, the plastic limit, the specific gravity, the soil classification and the hydrometer. Then, the liquid limit for these soils was measured through the above two mentioned methods. The obtained results indicated that the liquid limit values measured by the American and British standards are governed by specific rule depending on the silt and the clay fractions of the soil. This rule could be used to verify the compatibility of the liquid limits results by following two different standards for control purpose
Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Atterberg Cup; Fall Cone Penetrometer; Liquid Limit; Silt Fraction; Clay Fraction

Full Text:

PDF


References


A. Casagrande, Research on the atterberg limits of soils, Public Roads, Vol. 13 (Issue 8): 121-136, 1938

S. Hansbo, A new approach to the determination of the shear strength of clay by the fall cone test, The Royal Swedish Geotechnical Institute,(Issue 14), Stockholm, 1957.

A. Casagrade, Notes on the design of the liquid limit device, Geotechnique, Vol. 8 (Issue 2): 84-91, 1958.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geot.1958.8.2.84

G. F. Sower, A. Vesic, M. Grandolfi, Penetration tests for liquid limit, Papers on Soils – 1959 Meetings, STP 254, ASTM, pp. 216-226, Philadelphia, 1959.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/stp44320s

M. Budhu, The effect of clay content on liquid limit from fall cone and British cup device, Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 8 (Issue 2): 91-95, 1985.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/gtj10515j


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize