Effect of Tie Configurations on the Performances of R.C. Columns under Lateral and Vertical Loads


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


This paper presents results of an experimental investigation on the behavior of square short columns under both constant vertical load and variable horizontal load till failure to expedite the effect of new configuration of transverse reinforcement with alternate ties for columns. The columns divided to three sets according to the ties shapes (square (single-perimeter hoops), rhombus, hooked) to examine the effect of ties shape on the column capacity and ductility. Each set of columns consist of three columns having different ties shapes and subjected to constant axial load of 200 kN, 300 kN and 400 kN. The test results indicate that the columns with hooked (longitudinal) ties shape have the maximum lateral load capacity than the square shape and the lowest capacity is the rhombus shapes, this results may be related to reaction originate in the ties branches to resist shear force, as in case of hooked configuration the ties resist the lateral shear force by three branches rather than square tie having two branches only to resist shear force, and the rhombus tie having only two inclined resisting reactions.  Also results show that increasing the vertical load increase the lateral ultimate capacity and decrease both deflection and strain in longitudinal reinforcement. This finding may seriously be considered for columns subjected to seismic-type loading
Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Ties; Seismic; Columns; Stirrups; Shear; Flexural; Axial Load

Full Text:

PDF


References


American Concrete Institute (ACI). ‘‘Building code requirements for reinforced concrete.’’ ACI 318-95, Detroit, 1995.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14359/7970

Canadian Standards Association (CSA ‘‘CAN code for design of concrete structures for buildings.’’ 9CAN3-A23.3-M94, Rexdale, Ont., Canada, 1994.

Standards Association of New Zealand (SANZ). ‘‘NZS code of practice for the design of concrete structures.’’ Parts 1 and 2, Wellington, New Zealand, 1995.

Sheikh, S. A., and Khoury, S. S. ‘‘A performance-based approach for the design of confining steel in tied columns.’’ ACI Struct. J., volume 94, Issue (4), 421–431, 1997.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14359/493

Y. L. Mo and S. J. Wang, “Different Ties Configurations,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol 126, issue 10, pp.1122-1130, October 2000.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1122)

Mo, Y. and Hwang, M. ”New Configuration of Lateral Steel for RC Columns.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., ASCE, Vol 4, issue 3, pp.111-118, October 1999.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0680(1999)4:3(111)

Shamim A. Sheikh, and Ching-Chung Yeh) “Tied Concrete Columns under Axial Load and Flexure” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 116, No. 10, October, 1990.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1990)116:10(2780)

J. S. Kuang; H. F. Wong “Improving ductility of non-seismically designed RC columns” Proceedings of the ICE - Structures and Buildings, Volume 158, Issue 1, pages 13 –20, 2005.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2005.158.1.13

Vintzileou, E. and A. Stathatos, “Assessment of seismic behavior of R.C. columns”, Engineering Structure, 27: 1296-1311 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.002

M.B. Sharif, M. Ilyas and M. M. A. S. Baig “Comparison of confinement reinforceemnt in reinforced concrete structures” Pakistan Journal of Science , Vol. 62 No. 1 March, 2010.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2022 Praise Worthy Prize