Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Energy-Aware Objective Function for Routing Protocol in Internet of Things

(*) Corresponding author

Authors' affiliations



In recent years, the internet of things technology, commonly called “IoT” is one of the most important fields that has become the tremendous surge of interest from researchers. Internet of things visualizes an important future in which physical and digital entities can be connected, through suitable communication technologies, to allow development of new type of applications and services. However for IoT deployment, Energy efficiency is a critical concern due to the limited power capability of the sensing nodes. The objective function is used to construct a network and to determine how the mote selects and optimize path within a network based on specific metrics. Minimum rank with hysteresis objective function relies on quality link metric that is used to deal with the variation in link quality in the network. However, reliable links consume more energy than other nodes. This will drain the batteries of the overburdened nodes faster than other nodes which lead to reduce the overall network lifetimes as well as increase the probability of nodes failure. Therefore, to balance the power consumption rate among nodes, the node that has less power consumption value should be considered in routes selection. Thus, we have proposed a new objective function to balance power consumption among the nodes and prolong the node's battery while ensuring good packet reception ratio. The results have been compared with standard objective function. Simulation results verify that our proposed objective function achieves better energy balance and reduces the energy consumption while keeping good packet delivery ratio.
Copyright © 2017 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.


IoT; RPL; Objective Function; Energy Consumption; Contiki; LLNs; MRHOF

Full Text:



Gershenfeld, N.,Krikorian, R., &Cohen, D. (2004). The Internet of Things. Scientific American, the Sciences.

Li, B., &Yu, J. (2011). Research and application on the smart home based on component technologies and internet of things. Procedia Engineering, vol. 15, pp. 2087–2092.

Kelly,S. D. T., Suryadevara, N. K., &Mukhopadhyay, S. C. (2013).Towards the implementation of IoT for environmental condition monitoring in homes. Sensors Journal, IEEE, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 3846–3853.

Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A.,Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. Internet of Things Journal, IEEE, vol. 1,no. 1, pp. 22–32.

Rohokale, V. M., Prasad, N. R., & Prasad, R. (2011). A cooperative internet of things (iot) for rural healthcare monitoring and control in Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology (Wireless VITAE), 2nd International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 1–6.

Fan, Y. J., Yin, Y. H., Da Xu, L., Zeng,Y., &Wu, F. (2014). Iot-based smart rehabilitation system. Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1568–1577.

Yang, Z.,Wang, X., & Sun, H. (2013). Study on urban its architecture based on the internet of things. in LTLGB 2012. Springer, pp. 139–143.

Qasem, M., Al-Dubai, A., &Yassien, M. B. (2015, October). A Dynamic Power Tuning for the Constrained Application Protocol of Internet of Things. In Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing (CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM), 2015 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1118-1122). IEEE.

Fischione, C.,Park, P., Di Marco, P., & Johansson, KH. (2011). Design principles of wireless sensor networks protocols for control applications, Wireless Networking Based Control, 203.

SuraiyaTarannum, (2010). Energy Conservation Challenges in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Study. Wireless Sensor Network, 2, 483-491.

Winter, T., Thubert, P., Brandt, A., Clausen, T., Hui, J., Kelsey, P. Levis, R., Pister, K., Struik,R., &Vasseur, J. (2012). RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks. RFC 6550, IETF ROLL WG.

Vasseur, J.-P., Kim, M.,Pister, K.,Dejean, N., &Barthel,D. (2012). Routing metrics used for path calculation in low-power and lossy networks. Tech. Rep.

Thubert,P. (2012). Objective function zero for the routing protocol for low power and lossy networks (rpl). IETF Internet Draft: draft-ietfroll-of,0-03.

Gnawali, O. (2012).The minimum rank with hysteresis objective function. IETF Internet Draft: draft-ietfroll-of 0-03.

Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., &Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645-1660.

Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer networks, 54(15), 2787-2805

Bandyopadhyay, D., & Sen, J. (2011). Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wireless Personal Communications, 58(1), 49-69.

Evans, D. (2011). The internet of things: How the next evolution of the internet is changing everything. CISCO white paper, 1, 1-11.

Vermesan O., Friess, P., Guillemin, P., Sundmaeker, H., Eisenhauer, M., Moessner K., Arndt, M., M. Spirito, Medagliani, R.Giaffreda, S.Gusmeroli,L.Ladid, Serrano, M., Hauswirth, M., Baldini, G., (2014) Internet of things strategic research and innovation agenda. In: Vermesan O,&Friess P (eds) Internet of things – from research and innovation to market deployment. River Publishers, Aalborg, pp 7–142

Jules. (2006). RFID security and privacy: a research survey, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol.24, No.2, pp. 381–394.

Madakam, S. (2015) Internet of Things: Smart Things, International Journal of Future Computer and Communication, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 250-253.

Christin, D., Reinhardt, A., Mogre, S., &Steinmetz, R. (2009). Wireless Sensor Networks and the Internet of Things: Selected Challenges, Proceedings of the 8th GI/ITG KuVSFachgesprächDrahtloseSensornetze, 31-34.

Akyildiz, I., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). A survey on sensor networks, IEEE Communications Magazine 40 (8) 104–112.

Yick, J., Mukherjee, B., &Ghosal D. (2008). Wireless sensor network survey, Computer Networks, Vol.52, No.15, pp. 2292–2330.

Radoi, I. E., Shenoy, A., & Arvind, D. K. (2012, June). Evaluation of routing protocols for internet-enabled wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications, Venice, Italy (pp. 24-29).

Shelby,Z.,&Bormann, C. (2009). 6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet, ISBN: 9780470747995 (H/B), John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Roman, R., & Lopez, J. (2009). Integrating wireless sensor networks and the Internet. Internet Research 19, no. 2 pp. 246-259.

Sehgal, A. (2013). Using the ContikiCooja Simulator. Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen Campus Ring, 1, 28759.

Kim, K., Park, S., Chakeres, I., Perkins, C. (2007). Dynamic MANET on-demand for6LoWPAN (DYMO-low) routing. In: Internet Draft: draft- montenegro-6lowpandymo-low-routing-03

Tavakoli, M. (2009). HYDRO: A hybrid routing protocol for lossy and low power networks. In: IETF Internet Draft: draft-tavakoli-hydro-01.

Kim, K., Yoo, S., Park, J., Park, S.D., Lee, J. (2005). Hierarchical routing over6LoWPAN (HiLow). In: IETF: Internet Draft: draft-deniel-6lowpan-hilowhierarchical-routing-00.txt, vol. 38.

Gaddour, O., Koubâa, A., Baccour, N., &Abid, M. (2014) OF-FL: QoS-Aware Fuzzy Logic Objective Function for the RPL Routing Protocol. In: 12th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

Fotouhi, H. (2015) Reliable Mobility Support in Low-Power Wireless Networks. Phd Thesis CISTER-TR-150502, CISTER Research Center.

Altwassi, H.,Qasem, M., BaniYassein, M.,& Al-Dubai, A. (2015). Performance Evaluation of RPL Objective Functions. The 14th IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Communications (IUCC 2015), Liverpool, UK, pp. 1606 – 1613.

Gaddour, O., &Koubaa, A. (2012).RPL in a nutshell: A survey. Computer Networks, Vol. 56, No. 14, pp. 3163-3178.

Pavkovic, B.,Duda,A., Hwang, W., &Theoleyre, F. (2014). Efficient topology construction for RPL over IEEE 802.15.4 in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, Elsevier, pp. 25–38.

Tsvetkov,T. (2011). RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks. Sensor Nodes–Operation, Network and Application (SN), vol. 59, pp. 2.

Vasseur, J., Agarwal, N., Hui, J., Shelby, Z., Bertrand, P., &Chauvenet, C. (2011). RPL: The IP Routing Protocol Designed for Low Power and Lossy Networks; Internet Protocol for Smart Objects (IPSO) Alliance: Santa Clara, CA, USA.

Tsiftes, N., Eriksson, J., &Dunkels, A. (2010). Low-power Wireless IPv6 Routing with ContikiRPL. The 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, ACM, pp 406–407, Stockholm, Sweden.

Pavkovic, B.,Duda, A., Hwang, W., &Theoleyre, F. (2014) Efficient topology construction for RPL over IEEE 802.15.4 in wireless sensor networks, Ad Hoc Networks, Elsevier, pp. 25–38.

Sharma, R.,& Jayavignesh, T. (2015). Quantitative Analysis and Evaluation of RPL with Various Objective Functions for 6LoWPAN. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 8(19), DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i19/76696.

Kamgueu, P. O.,Nataf,E.,Ndi´e, T. D., &. Festor,O. (2013). Energy-based routing metric for rpl. Research Report RR-8208, INRIA.

Iova, O., Theoleyre F.,& Noel, T. (2015). Using multiparent routing in rpl to increase the stability and the lifetime of the network. Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 29, pp. 45–62.

Xiao, W., Liu, J., Jiang, N.,& Shi,H. (2014). An optimization of the object function for routing protocol of low-power and lossy networks. In Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), 2014 2nd International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 515–519.

Gonizzi, P., Monica, R., & Ferrari, G. (2013). Design and evaluation of a delay efficient rpl routing metric. In Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), 2013 9th International. IEEE, pp. 1573–1577

Karkazis, Leligou, P., Sarakis, H.C., Zahariadis, L., Trakadas, T., Velivassaki, P., &Capsalis, T.H. (2012). Design of primary and composite routing metrics for RPL-compliant wireless sensor network .In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Telecommunications and Multimedia (TEMU), Chania, Greece, pp. 13–18.

Chang L., Lee T., Chen S., & Liao C. (2013). Energy-Efficient Oriented Routing Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernatics.

Nurmio, J., Nigussie, E., &Poellabauer, C. (2015). Equalizing Energy Distribution in Sensor Nodes through Optimization of RPL. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing.

Tang, W., Ma, X., Huang, J., & Wei, j. (2015). Toward Improved RPL: A Congestion Avoidance Multipath Routing Protocol with Time Factor for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Journal of Sensors.

Tsiftes, N., Eriksson, J., Finne, N., Fredrik, O., Höglund, J., &Dunkels, A. (2010). A Framework for Low-Power IPv6 Routing Simulation, Experimentation, and Evaluation. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM conference, pp. 479–480.

Nuvolone, M. (2010). Stability analysis of the delays of the routing protocol over low power and lossy networks, Master’s thesis, KTH RIT.

Voigt, T. (2012). Contiki COOJA Crash Course. The International School on Cooperative Robots and Sensor Networks (RoboSense School 2012), Hammamet, Tunisia.

“Contik O.S and coojasimulatoer”[Last accessed May2015].

Osterlind, F., Dunkels, A., Eriksson, J., Finne, N., & Voigt, T. (2006, November). Cross-level sensor network simulation with cooja. In Local computer networks, proceedings 2006 31st IEEE conference on (pp. 641-648).

Fredrik Osterlind. Mobility cooja plugin., 2014.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Please send any question about this web site to
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize