Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Full Integration of Light RPAS into Not Segregated Airspace: Preliminary Safety Analysis for the Implementation of a Risk Model

Federica Bonfante(1), Paolo Maggiore(2), Francesco Grimaccia(3), Edoardo Filippone(4), Matteo Davide Lorenzo Dalla Vedova(5*)

(1) Politecnico di Torino, Italy
(2) Politecnico di Torino, Italy
(3) Politecnico di Milano, Italy
(4) CIRA - Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali, Italy
(5) Politecnico di Torino, Italy
(*) Corresponding author


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/irease.v13i5.19005

Abstract


A general evolution of airspace and air traffic management is ongoing in Europe including significant novelties for manned aviation. The most important one is the full integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) in the next future and the full integration of automated air vehicles and Driverless Personal Air Vehicles (DPAV) afterwards with manned aircraft. The economic impact of integration of RPAS with manned aircraft into not segregated airspace to perform aerial work is very important. European and worldwide Aviation Authorities and other organizations (EUROCONTROL, JARUS, RTCA, etc.) are working to elaborate new regulations and standards to maintain the current level of safety of aerial operations facing the incoming new entry in the airspace. The implementation of a comprehensive preliminary risk model is deemed to be propaedeutic to any former safety analysis of the new operational scenario: RPAS and manned aircraft flying together into a not segregated airspace. Such risk model is defined in accordance to the Safety Risk Management Pillar of Safety Management System model. The safety analysis for the implementation of the above mentioned preliminary risk model is presented and discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2020 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Risk Model; Safety Analysis; RPAS; UAV Full Integration; Not-Segregated Airspace

Full Text:

PDF


References


International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Circular 328/AN 190, Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), (© ICAO, Montreal, 2011).

European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment, accompanying the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Civil Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing regulation (EC) number 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, (EC, Brussel, 2015).
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781782258674.0004

Single European SKY ATM Research (SESAR), European ATM Master Plan, Roadmap for the safe integration of drones in all classes of airspaces.

Kopardekar P. et al. Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management (UTM) Concept of Operations, 16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3292

Single European Sky ATM Research Joint Undertaking (SESAR JU), U-Space Blueprint, DOI:10.2829/335092 (Luxembourg, 2017).

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Annex 19 presentation 24th September 2013, (accessed on the web on the 05th November 2018).

https://www.icao.int/safety/SafetyManagement/Documents/Annex%2019%20-%20ICAO%20presentation%20-%20self%20instruction%2024September2013.pdf

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Doc. 9859/AN 474, Safety Management Manual (SMM), third ed. ((© ICAO, Montreal, 2013)

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Doc. 10019/AN 507, Manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS), first ed. ((© ICAO, Montreal, 2015)

Single European Sky ATM Research Joint Undertaking (SESAR JU), https://www.sesarju.eu/index.php/discover-sesar, (accessed on the web on the 12th January 2020)

Single European Sky ATM Research Joint Undertaking (SESAR JU), Demonstrating RPAS integration in the European aviation system, A summary of SESAR drone demonstration projects results, (SESAR JU, Bruxelles, 2016)

Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali (CIRA), SESAR Joint Undertaking RPAS 0.3 RAID Demonstration Report, SESAR Joint Undertaking, first ed. (SESARJU, Bruxelles, 2016)

F., Bonfante et al, E., Risk analysis of the future implementation of a Safety Management System for multiple RPAS based on first demonstration flights, Electronics, MDPI, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics6030050

F. Bonfante, Safety Management System for light RPAS, Analysis of a real case: study on the safety and the integration in the civil airspace with an evaluation of the regulatory impact in Italy, Doctoral dissertation, Dept. Aerosp. Eng. Politecnico di Torino, -Turin, Italy, 2019.

European Safety Aviation Agency (EASA), EASA Notice for Proposed Amendement A NPA 2015-10 Part A & Part B (Cologne, 2017).

European Safety Aviation Agency (EASA), Opinion No. 01/2018, Introduction of a regulatory framework for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems in the ‘open’ and ‘specific’ categories, (Cologne, 2018).

European Safety Aviation Agency (EASA), Easy Access Rules for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (Regulation (EU) 2019/947 and Regulation (EU) 2019/945), (Cologne, 2020).

European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL), RPAS ATM CONOPS, first ed. (EUROCONTROL, Bruxelles, 2017).
https://doi.org/10.1109/icnsurv.2017.8012044

European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) and European Safety Aviation Agency (EASA), UAS ATM integration, Operational concept, first ed. (EUROCONTROL, EASA, 2018).
https://doi.org/10.1163/1570-6664_iyb_sim_org_39214

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Doc. 9854, Global Air Traffic Management Concept, first ed. (© ICAO, Montreal, 2005).

European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC, (Brussel, 2008).
https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845258904-1478

Single European Sky ATM Research Joint Undertaking (SESAR JU), https://www.sesarju.eu/index.php/U-space, accessed on the web on the 12th January 2020.

Z. Sándor et al, Z., Challenges Caused by the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in the Air Traffic Management, Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 47(2).
https://doi.org/10.3311/pptr.11204

Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_radar, accessed on the Web on the 07th May 2018.

Universal Avionics Systems Corporation, Understanding Required Navigation Performance (RNP) and Area Navigation (RNAV) operations, White Paper, Document No.WHTP-2013-16-10, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1109/dasc.2008.4702773

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Doc. 9613/AN937, Performance Navigation Based (PBN) manual, third ed. (© ICAO, Montreal, 2008).

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Doc. 9849/AN457, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) manual, second ed. (© ICAO, Montreal, 2012).

European Space Agency (ESA), EGNOS brochure, BR-284, ISBN 978-92-9221-012-0, ISSN 0250-1589, (ESA, 2009).

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Functional requirements document for HALE UAS operations in the NAS Step 1, third ed. (NASA, 2006).

Department of Defence, Military Standard 1629 Revision A, (United States of America, 1980).

Department of Defence, Military Handbook 338 Revision B, (United States of America, 1998).

Deloitte Consulting S.r.l. Aviation & Transportation, HFACS human factors approach to accident analysis classification system prevention, Short Course, (Deloitte, Turin, 2016).

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-HFACS-framework_fig1_255713130, accessed on the web on the 27th March 2018

Franco De Oliveira Martins, B. J., L. C. Sandoval Góes, Failure analysis methods in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Proceedings of COBEM 2007, 19th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering, ABCM (2007)

E. Petritol et al, Reliability and maintenance analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, MDPI, Sensors (2018).

I. J. Olson et al, Qualitative failure analysis for a small quadrotor Unmanned Aircraft System, University of Michigan, 2013.

P. M. Freeman, Reliability assessment for low-cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota, MN, 2014.

S. Reimann, J. Amos, E. Bergquist, E. Cole, J. Phillips, J., S. Shuster, Professor P. Seiler (Advisor), UAV for reliability, AEM 4331 – Aerospace Vehicle Design, (2013).

P. Freeman, G. J. Balas, Actuation Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for a Small UAV A, American Control Conference (ACC), 978-1-4799-3271-9, Portland OR (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1109/acc.2014.6859482

B. Syd Ali et al, ADS-B system failure modes and models, Journal of Navigation, 67(6), 995-1017 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.1017/s037346331400037x

B. Ali et al, ADS-B: probabilistic safety assessment, Journal of Navigation, 70(4) 887-906, (2017).

W. Denson, G. Chandler, W. Crowell, R. Wanner, DTIC, Non electronic parts reliability data, (Reliability Analysis Centre, Rome, 1991).
https://doi.org/10.21236/ada242083

L. J. Tyrone, Handbook of reliability prediction procedures for mechanical equipment, revision A (Naval Surface Warfare Centre, Carderok Division, West Bethesda, 2006).

Department of Defence, Military Handbook 217 Revision F, Reliability prediction of electronic equipment, revision F, (United States of America, 1991).

European Global Navigation Satellite System Agency (EGNOS Agency), EGNOS Safety of Life (SoL) service definition document, (EGNOS Agency, 2016).

Cobham Avionics Integrated Systems, GPS - WAAS receiver data sheet Texas, United States of America, 2008, https://www.cobham.com/media/153262/gps-waas_datasheet.pdf, accessed on the web on the 07th February 2019.

Gables Engineering, G7614 Series ATC/TCAS/Flight ID with ADS-B Fault Annunciator, https://www.gableseng.com/gei/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/G7614-Series-ADSB-Fact-Sheet-Rev-03-Final.pdf, accessed on the web on the 07th February 2019

Defence and Space Electronic Systems, Honeywell International Inc., Minneapolis MN Air Data Unit Product family data sheet, 2003.

https://aerocontent.honeywell.com/aero/common/documents/myaerospacecatalog-documents/MilitaryAC/Air_Data_Products.pdf, accessed on the web on the 07th February 2019

S. Reimann, J. Amos, E. Bergquist, J. Cole, J. Phillips, S. Shuster, Professor P. Seiler (Advisor), UAV for reliability, AEM 4331 – Aerospace Vehicle Design. (2013).

K. W. Williams, A summary of Unmanned Aircraft Accident/Incident data: human factors implications, FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Oklahoma City OK.

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Annex 2, Rules of the Air, tenth ed. (© ICAO, Montreal, 2005).

International Civil Aviation Organization, Automatic Dependant Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B out): ensuring preparedness for the 2020 equipage mandate, NACC/DCA/08 - IP/12, Information Paper, (© ICAO, Montreal, 2017).

F. Bonfante F., M. D. L Dalla Vedova, Evaluations on hydrogen fuel cells as a source of energy for specific operations category civil RPAS systems, WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, Volume 14, E-ISSN: 2224-3496, (2018).

E. Ranquist, A. M. Steiner, B. Argrow, Exploring the range of weather impacts on UAS operations, University of Colorado Boulder, CO (2017).

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Doc. 9974/ANB 487, Flight safety and volcanic ash, first ed. (© ICAO, Montreal, 2012).

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Air Traffic Organization, SMS, Safety Management System Manual, fourth ed. (FAA, USA, 2014).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2021 Praise Worthy Prize