Stress, Pressure and Fatigue on Aircraft Maintenance Personal
(*) Corresponding author
This paper focuses on an analysis of the stress, the pressure and the fatigue as part of the Dirty Dozen and Human Factors procedures. An online international survey has been carried out to ascertain the professional levels of the fatigue, the stress and their pressure exposure. This work is a contribution to the aeronautical safety in order to alert authorities about the stress, the pressure and the fatigue that aircraft maintenance personnel suffers. Safety is the main driver in aviation related professions. Maintenance related personnel is constantly subjected to several external circumstances that might originate errors in the performance or evaluation in maintenance related tasks. Authorities have clearly regulated flight crew and air traffic controllers working and resting periods, but maintenance personnel regulations do not reflect the same procedures. The Aeronautical industry 4.0 with the upcoming digital transformation will increase the safety margin and it will reduce the aircraft maintenance ground time.
Copyright © 2019 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.
International Civil Aviation Organization, 2013. Safety Management Manual, Doc 9859 AN/474, third ed., Montréal.
E. Gered, A study of challenges to the success of the safety management system in aircraft maintenance organizations in Turkey, Safety Science, vol. 73, 2015, pp. 106-116.
S. M. O. Tavares, P. M. S. T. de Castro, Maintenance, Damage Tolerance of Metallic Aircraft Structures Materials and Numerical Modelling, Heidelberg: Springer, 2019, pp. 17-22.
D. A. Wiegmann, S.A. Shappell, A human error approach to aviation accident analysis, Ashgate Publishing, UK, 2003.
M. Ward, N. McDonald, R. Morrison, D. Gaynor, T. Nugent, A performance improvement case study in aircraft maintenance and its implications for hazard identiﬁcation, Ergonomics, vol. 53, n. 2, February 2010, pp. 247-267.
K. A. Latorella, P. V. Prabhu, A review of human error in aviation maintenance and inspection, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 26, 2000, pp. 133-161.
Othman, N., Romli, F., Mental Workload Evaluation of Pilots Using Pupil Dilation, (2016) International Review of Aerospace Engineering (IREASE), 9 (3), pp. 80-84.
Aviation Safety Network, https://aviation-safety.net/.
EASA, ICAO Annex 19, Safety management, International Standards and Recommended Practices, European Aviation Safety Agency, July 2013.
A. Hobs, K. B. Avers, J. J. Hils, Fatigue risk management in aviation maintenance: current best practices and potential future countermeasures, DOT/FAA/AM-11/10, Federal Aviation Administration, USA, June 2011.
EASA Part-Air Operations, European Aviation Safety Agency, January 2014.
EASA Part-145, Maintenance Organization Approvals, European Aviation Safety Agency, October 2008.
EASA Part-M, Continuing Airworthiness Requirements, European Aviation Safety Agency, June 2017.
D-AIPX Final Report, Ministère de l’Ecologie, du Développement durable et de l’Energie, March 2016, https://www.bea.aero/uploads/tx_elydbrapports/BEA2015-0125.en-LR.pdf.
R. C. Graeber, D. A. Marx, Reducing human error in aviation maintenance operations, The Flight Safety Foundation 46th Annual International Air Safety Seminar, pp. 1-7, November 1993, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
G. Dupont, The dirty dozen errors in aviation maintenance, 11th Federal Aviation Admin. Meeting on Human Factors Issues in Aircraft Maintenance and Inspection: Human Error in Aviation Maintenance, pp. 45-49, 1997, Washington, USA.
FAA AMT Handbook Addendum Human Factors, Federal Aviation Administration, 2014.
J. A. Yeow, P. K. Ng, K .S. Tan, T. S. Chin, W. Y. Lim, Effects of stress, repetition, fatigue and work environment on human error in manufacturing industries, Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 14, n. 3, 2014, pp. 3464-3471.
P. Oliveira, Effects of stress and pressure in high performance employments: aeronautical maintenance. Aeronautical Sciences Thesis Degree, in Portuguese, July 2017, Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências, Lisboa.
J. C. Taylor, R. L. Thomas III, Toward measuring safety culture in aviation maintenance: the structure of trust and professionalism; The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, vol. 13 n. 4, November 2009, pp. 321-343.
D. Virovac, A. Domitrović, E. Bazijanac, The influence of human factor in aircraft maintenance, Promet-Traffic&Transportation, vol. 29, n. 3, 2017, pp. 257-266.
Y. Wang, J. C. Keller, Ch. Huang, and R. O. Fanjoy, An exploratory study: correlations between occupational stressors, coping mechanisms, and job performance among chinese aviation maintenance technicians, Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, vol. 5, n.2, 2016, pp. 69-80.
FAA Human Factors Operators Manual, Federal Aviation Administration, 2014.
E. Yazgan, M. Ş. Kavsaoğlu, Evaluation of stress affecting aircraft maintenance technician’s performance, International Journal of Computing, Communications & Instrumentation Engineering, vol. 4, n. 1, 2017, pp. 2349-1469.
O. Usanmaz, Training of the maintenance personnel to prevent failures in aircraft systems, Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 18, n. 7, October 2011, pp. 1683-1688.
Y.-H. Chang, Y.-Ch. Wang, Signiﬁcant human risk factors in aircraft maintenance technicians, Safety Science, vol. 48, 2010, pp. 54-62.
A. Atak, S. Kingma, Safety culture in an aircraft maintenance organisation: a view from the inside, Safety Science, vol. 49, n. 2, February 2011, pp. 268-278.
N. C. Batista, R. Melicio, V. M. F. Mendes, Services enabler architecture for smart grid and smart living services providers under industry 4.0, Energy and Buildings, vol. 14, 2017, pp. 16-27.
European Commission, Industry 4.0 in aeronautics: IOT applications, June 2017, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/dem/monitor/content/industry-40-aeronautics-iot-applications.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Please send any question about this web site to email@example.com
Copyright © 2005-2023 Praise Worthy Prize