The Effect of Microstructure Size on Bar Cross-Sectional Area Changes in Elastic Tensile Deformation

(*) Corresponding author

Authors' affiliations

DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)


In classical elasticity, the displacement, strain and stress are homogeneous and the analysis of the tensile bar is based on the initial cross-sectional area of the bar specimen which is assumed constant for a restricted small uniform deformation. However, in experimental mechanics, tested specimens often present inhomogeneous strain distribution and it is usually difficult to obtain reliable measurement values in the presence of high strain gradient.
In this paper the analysis of the tensile deformation of the bar within the elastic regime is based on the gradient elasticity theory, which includes higher order strain gradient terms and an internal length scale in the constitutive stress-strain relation. Thus, a relation is established between the macro-scale and micro-scale deformation of the bar which results in inhomogeneous displacement, strain and stress. Hence, unlike in the classical elasticity theory by imposing a displacement controlled deformation, the effect of changes in the microstructure dimension is reflected in the bar cross-sectional area. Thus, it is shown to be non-uniform in contrast to the classical elasticity assumption and to also exhibit size and scale dependence response.
Copyright © 2014 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.


Microstructure Size; Gradient Elasticity; Tensile Bar; Cross-Sectional Area

Full Text:



F. Lagattu, J. Brillaud, M-C. Lafarie-Frenot. High strain gradient measurements by using digital image correlation technique Materials Characterization 53 17–28, 2004.

E. C. Aifantis, On the microstructural origin of certain inelastic models, Transactions of ASME, J. Engng. Mat. Tech. 106, 326-330, 1984.

A. C. Aifantis. Gradient effects at macro, micro and nano scales, J. Mech. Behavior Mats., 5, 355-375, 1994.

B. S. Altan, and E. C. Aifantis. On some aspects in the special theory of gradient elasticity, J. Mech. Behavior Mats. 8, 231-282, 1997.

N. A. Fleck, G. M. Muller, M. F. Ashby, J. W. Hutchinson, Strain gradient plasticity: theory and experiment, Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 475 – 487, 1994.

H. Gao, Y. Huang, W. D. Nix, and J.W. Hutchinson. Mechanism based strain gradient plasticity – I Theory, J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 47, 1239 – 1263, 1999.

K., Kosmidis, F. Akintayo and E.C. Aifantis Solution of Spherical Lame problems within the framework of Gradient Elasticity, Proc. 6th National Congress of Mechanics 3, Thessaloniki, Greece, Ed. E.C. Aifantis, A.N. Kounaidis, 136-141, 2001.

K. G. Tsepoura, S. Papargyri-Beskou, D. Polyzos, D. E. Beskos. Static and dynamic analysis of a gradient-elastic bar in tension, Achieve of Applied Mechanics, 72, 483 – 497, 2002.

O. T., Akintayo, Analytical and Numerical Study of the Behavior of Materials and Structures in Gradient Elasticity, Ph.D. dissertation, Gen. Dept. Eng. Sch., Aristotle University Thessaloniki 2011.

Akintayo, O.T., Papadopoulos, P.G., Aifantis, E.C., A note on gradient truss models, (2012) International Review of Mechanical Engineering (IREME), 6 (4), pp. 691-697.

Olufemi T. Akintayo, Towards a Gradient Truss Model. Part I: Bar Element Displacement-Force Relations, (2014) International Review of Civil Engineering (IRECE), 5 (1), pp. 32-42.

H. Askes, E. C. Aifantis, Gradient elasticity in statics and

dynamics: An overview of formulations, length scale identification procedures, finite element implementations and new results, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 48, 13 pp. 1962-1990, 2011.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Please send any question about this web site to
Copyright © 2005-2023 Praise Worthy Prize