Synthesis of Proton Exchange Membranes from Natural Rubber
A. Realpe et al.
800 views since: 2014-01-31

Design of Ant Colony Optimized Shunt Active Power Filter for Load Compensation
S. Aruchamy et al.
390 views since: 2014-08-31

Characterization and Thermal Degradation of Rice Husk via TGA
K. Isa et al.
299 views since: 2014-07-31

High Performance Direct Torque and Flux Control of Induction Motor Drive Using Fuzzy Logic Based Speed Controller
T. Ramesh et al.
293 views since: 2013-04-30

Research Note on Surface Tension Relaxation of Lubricants by Humidification of the Gas Phase
M. Alvarez-Valenzuela et al.
286 views since: 2014-03-31

Focus and Scope

The International Journal on Advanced Materials and Technologies (IREAMT) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original theoretical and applied papers on all aspects of advanced materials and related technologies.

The topics to be covered include but are not limited to all aspects regarding:

- Advanced Materials

materials science, liquid crystals, semiconductors, superconductors, optics, lasers, sensors, porous materials, light emitting materials, ceramics, adhesives, biological materials, metallic, thin films, colloids, energy materials, photovoltaics, solar cells, biomaterials, photonics, ferroelectrics, multiferroics, metamaterials, self-assembly, hierarchical materials, batteries, supercapacitors, thermoelectrics, polymer-based composites, metal-matrix composites, nanomaterials, nanocomposites, nanotubes, nanowires, nanoparticles, carbon, diamond, fullerenes, shape memory alloys, actuator/sensor (smart) materials and electromagnetic materials, models of the macroscopic properties of materials (mechanical, chemical, electrical, magnetic and optical) in terms of microscopic mechanisms, mechanic aspects of advanced materials and structures, damage and failure mechanisms in material, mathematical formulation of the kinematic, constitutive, and structural behavior of materials and structures, experimental methods directed toward mechanical characterization, damage evolution, and failures in materials and structures, computational methods for the solution of micro-, meso-, macro-mechanics mathematical models, methods dealing with the determination of local effects, innovative computational approaches for material and structural modeling of new and advanced materials, numeric simulation of materials behavior and processing, measuring methods and applications.

- Technologies

nanotechnology, nanobiotechnology, tissue engineering, self-assembly, processing and manufacturing of composite, laser methods in materials processing, modern casting and powder metallurgical techniques, nondestructive testing techniques, welding, sintering, heat treatment, thermo-chemical treatment, thin & thick coatings, surface treatment, machining, plastic forming, quality assessment, , technological devices and equipment, theoretical fundamentals of cleaner production, industrial application of cleaner production methods, production and operations management, manufacturing technology management.

The Editorial policy is to maintain a reasonable balance between papers regarding different research areas so that the Journal will be useful to all interested scientific groups.

IREAMT also publishes letters to the Editor and research notes which discuss new research, or research in progress in any of the above thematic areas.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Special Section on 5th CEAM 2013 - Virtual Forum

Editors

• Editorial Staff

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

After submitting a paper, it will be peer-reviewed.
All our journals are peer-reviewed. Reviewers are appointed by the journal editor.

Peer review has two key functions: 
- To act as a filter and determine the validity, significance and originality of the work to ensure only good research is published. 
- To improve the quality of research submitted for publication by giving reviewers the opportunity to suggest improvements.

The review procedure

Each submitted paper is subjected to the following review procedure:
- Preliminarly, the Plagiarism Prevention Office (plagiarismprev@praiseworthyprize.org) checks each submission through the Ithenticate’s CrossCheck software, in order to detect instances of overlapping and similar text in submitted manuscripts (click here to find out more about CrossCheck for Researchers), comunicating the results of the test to the Editor-in-Chief of the journal only in the case of abnormal percentage of similarity;
- the Editor-in-Chief, if not in conflict of interest, decides for general publication suitability;
- in case of conflict of interest, the Editorial Office invites an Editor (Helper editor) to handle the paper;
- the Editor-in-Chief (or the Helper Editor) invites 3 Reviewers to perform an independent review of the article; 
- the Journal adopts a single-blind peer review: the Reviewers are aware of the identity of the Authors, but the Authors are unaware of the identity of the Reviewers;
- taking care of the recommendations of the Reviewers, the Editor-in-Chief (or the Helper Editor) decides whether the particular article may be accepted as it is, or it may be revised or rejected;
- the Editor contact the Corresponding Author by email with the editorial decision, Editor comments and Reviewer comments. Authors will be requested to revise their manuscript according to the Reviewers' suggestions, comments and criticisms;
- the revised manuscript must be returned within one month and the review process begins again.

Peer review process flowchart



Ethical Guidelines

Publication Frequency

The Journal is published annually.

Journal's Consent Policy

Generic users, readers and authors who register themselves for a private access to the journal website, give implicitly their consent for Praise Worthy Prize to process their personal data in compliance with the Privacy Policy they had sight of.

Reviewers Suggestion

In the submission process, the submitter is requested for kindly suggest three potential reviewers with the appropriate acknowledged expertise to review the manuscript. These reviewers will not be automatically approved by the Managing Editor.
At Step 1 of the submission procedure please provide detailed contact information (address, homepage, phone, verified institutional e-mail address). The proposed reviewers should neither be current collaborators of the co-authors nor have published with any of the co-authors of the manuscript within the last five years, according to the Ethical requirement of the review process. They should be from different institutions of the authors. The submitter may also identify appropriate members of the Editorial Board of this journal or others Praise Worthy Prize's journals as potential reviewers. The submitter may also suggest reviewers from the authors that you frequently cite in your paper.