Effect of Boundary Layer Mixing Devices on Hysteresis Behavior of Flow Past a Pitching Airfoil

Deepakkumar M. Sharma(1*), Kamal Poddar(2), A. Muthukumar(3), KSV Reddy(4)

(1) National Wind Tunnel Facility, IIT-Kanpur, India
(2) Department of Aerospace Engineering, IIT-Kanpur, India
(3) National Aerospace Laboratories, India
(4) National Wind Tunnel Facility, IIT-Kanpur, India
(*) Corresponding author

DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)


Wind tunnel experiments were carried out on NLF-0416 airfoil model to investigate the effect of boundary Layer mixing devices on the aerodynamic characteristics and hysteresis behavior associated with the pitching motion of the airfoil. Pressure measurements were carried out on the mid span of the airfoil and in the wake for quantitative information. The hysteresis behavior was observed in aerodynamic characteristics as a function of pitch rates and was found to increase with pitch rates. For the pitch rates covered in the present study, no large eddy vortex formation associated with deep dynamic stall was observed. The results show significant improvements in hysteresis behavior and aerodynamic characteristics by the application of boundary layer mixing devices. The data show that placing the vortex generators between 5% and 7% of the chord which corresponds to the approximate location of the pressure peak at lower angles of attack, increases the lift coefficient and hysteresis lift significantly while improving the drag characteristics. Vortex generators close to the pressure peak allows the mixing of the outer flow and boundary layer flow to occur before reaching adverse pressure gradient. At low angle of attack region vortex generators completely removes the hysteresis loops. In order to arrest the spanwise flow, boundary layer fences were also used which resulted in improvement of stall characteristics.
Copyright © 2015 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.


Pitching Airfoil; Dynamic Stall; Hysteresis; Flow Control; Vortex Generator; Boundary Layer Fence

Full Text:



W. Johnson et al, On the mechanism of Dynamic Stall, J. Am. Helicopter Soc. (1972), pp. 36-45.

J. M. Martin et al, An Experimental Analysis of Dynamic Stall on an Oscillating Airfoil, Journal of American Helicopter Society, 19(1974), pp. 26–32.

W. J. McCroskey et al, Unsteady Viscous Flow on Oscillating Airfoils, AIAA Journal, 13 (1) (1975), pp. 71-79.

W. J. McCroskey et al, Dynamic Stall on Advanced Airfoil Sections, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 26(3) (1981), pp. 40-50.

W. J. McCroskey, Unsteady airfoils, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14(1982), pp. 285–311.

E. J. Jumper et al, Lift-Curve Characteristics for an Airfoil Pitching at Constant Rate, Journal of Aircraft, 24 (10) (1987), pp. 680-687.

L. W Carr, Progress in Analysis and Prediction of Dynamic Stall, Journal of Aircraft, 25 (1) (1988), pp. 6-17.

L. E Ericsson et al, Dynamic Overshoot of static Stall Angle, Journal of Aircraft, 22 (7) (1985), pp. 637-638.

L. E. Ericsson, Moving Wall Effects in Unsteady Flow, Journal of Aircraft, 25 (11) (1988), pp. 977-990.

K. Biber et al, Hysteresis Effects on Wind Tunnel Measurements of a Two-Element Airfoil, AIAA Journal, 31 (2) (1993), pp. 326-330.

R. B. Green et al, Phenomena observed during aerofoil ramp-down motions from the fully separated state, Aeronautical Journal, 98 (979) (1994), pp. 349-356.

M. J. Rhee, A Study of Dynamic Stall Vortex Development using Two-Dimensional data from the AFDD Oscillating Wing Experiment, NASA/TM-2002-211857(2002), AFDD/TR-02-A-009.

S. Mittal et al, Hysteresis in Flow Past a NACA 0012 Airfoil, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 191 (19-20) (2002), pp. 2207-2217.

A. Ferrecchia et al, An Investigation of dynamic stall onset on the pitching wing, Aeronautical Journal, 107 (2003), pp. 487-494.

A. Krothapalli et al, Investigation of Flow at Leading and Trailing Edges of Pitching-Up Airfoil, AIAA Journal, Vol. 33 (8) (1995), pp. 1369-1376.

K. Poddar et al, Experimental study of a two-element airfoil, Journal of Institution of Engineers (India), Aerospace Engineering division, 86 (2005), pp. 58-68.

J.F. Marchman et al, Aerodynamics of Aspect Ratio 8 Wing at Low Reynolds Numbers, Journal of Aircraft, 22 (7) (1985), pp. 628-634.

P. F Lorber et al, Airfoil Dynamic Stall at Constant Pitch Rate and High Reynolds Number, Journal of Aircraft, 25 (3) (1988), pp. 548-556.

D. Weaver et al, Control of VR-7 Dynamic Stall by Strong Steady Blowing, Journal of Aircraft, 41 (6) (2004), pp. 1404-1413.

F. B. Hsiao et al, High-incidence airfoil aerodynamics improvement by leading-edge oscillating flap, Journal of Aircraft, 35 (1998), pp. 508–510.

K. Nguyen, Active control of helicopter blade stall, Journal of Aircraft, 35 (1998), pp. 91–98.

D. Greenblatt et al, Dynamic stall control by intermittent periodic excitation, Journal of Aircraft, 38 (2001), pp. 188–190.

J. Magill et al, Dynamic stall control using a model-based observer, Journal of Aircraft, 40 (2003), pp. 355–362.

Lance W. Traub et al, Effects of Active and Passive Flow Control on Dynamic-Stall Vortex Formation , Journal of Aircraft, 41 (2) (2004), pp. 405-408.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2020 Praise Worthy Prize