A Performance Comparison of Energy Efficient MAC Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks
With the increasing research in sensor networks in recent years, new application domains such as tactical, environmental and medical have evolved. To match the need of those applications, sensor networks require specific protocol solutions. Researchers, over the recent past, have proposed various communication protocols for sensor networks. Among other layers, MAC (Medium Access Control) poses challenges to provide techniques able to reduce the energy consumption, maximize the throughput and improve latency in addition to arbitrate the access to the shared medium. Some of these goals may be conflicting and may require trade-offs. In this paper, we review IEEE 802.11 which is a contention-based protocol, TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) as a schedule-based method and SMAC, Adaptive SMAC and ZMAC which are hybrid approaches targeted at high traffic wireless sensor networks. Later on, the performances of these protocols are discussed. Our comparison is conducted from the energy property, the latency and the throughput perspective; then, we explore the introduced trade-offs. Furthermore, we outline the characteristics of the studied protocols and we evaluate the relative merit of each.
Copyright © 2018 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.
Ye, W., Heidemann, J. and Estrin, D., An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks”, Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, pages: 1567-1576, Year of Publication: 2002.
Ye, W. Heidemann, J. and Estrin, D., Medium Access Control With Coordinated Adaptive Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Networks, IEEE/ACM transactions on Networking, pp. 493-506, 2004.
IEEE Computer Society LAN MAN Standards Committee: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, ANSI/IEEE Std. 802.11, 1999.
Rhee, I., Warrier, A., Aia, M., and Min, J., ZMAC: a Hybrid MAC for Wireless Sensor Networks, Proceedings of the third ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Year of Publication: 2005.
Kannan, R., Kalidindi, R. and Iyengar, S.S., Energy and Rate based MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks, Proceedings of SIGMOD, Year of Publication: 2003.
Krishnamachari, G.L.B., and Raghavendra, C.S., An Adaptive Energy-Efficient and Low-Latency MAC for Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Networks, Proceedings of the 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, page: 224, Year of Publication: 2004.
Kredo, K., and Mohapatra, P., Medium Access Control in Wireless Sensor Networks, Computer Networks, 2006.
Dam, T.V., and Langendoen, K., An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks, Proceedings of the first ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages: 171-180, Year of Publication: 2003.
Suh, C. and Ko, Y.B., A Traffic Aware, Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks, Proceedings of the IEEE/ISCAS International Symposium on Circuit and Systems, 2005.
Ramantham, S., A unified framework and algorithms for (T/F/C) DMA channel assignment in wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 900-907, Year of Publication: 1997.
Polastre, J., Hill J. and Culler, D., Versatile Low power Media Access for Wireless Sensor Networks, Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), Year of Publication: 2004.
Chen, F., Dressler, F., and Heindl, A., End-to-End Performance Characteristics in Energy-Aware Wireless Sensor Networks, Proceedings of the ACM PE-WASUN, pages: 41-46, Year of Publication: 2006.
Lucent, http://www.lucent.com/orinoco, 2003.
Crow, B., Widjaja, I., Kim, J.G., and Sakai, P., IEEE 802.11 Wireless Local Area Networks, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 116-126, 1997.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Please send any question about this web site to email@example.com
Copyright © 2005-2020 Praise Worthy Prize