Goal Question Metrics and Its Application to Process Management and Improvement
(*) Corresponding author
Success of an organization entirely depends upon the management and improvement of the processes. There are many methods to evaluate process improvement; one of them is goal question metrics. Goal Question Metric is easy to implement and handle. Moreover, it provides chance to justify goals through questions by involving stakeholder itself. In order to evaluate goals, measurements are performed by targeting related functionalities. Results are obtained quantitatively and help to manage the processes in an efficient way. In addition, it gives opportunity to look at strengths and the weaknesses more clearly, and addresses them in future to manage the process improvement by controlled and effective set of actions. As each defined goal is measured, it is an appropriate strategy to justify it as well as to identify weak process area, if any discrepancies exist in goal accomplishment. It can be successfully applied to manage the processes and improve them by selecting suitable method of measures and analyzing obtained results in order to observe existing trend and planning for future accordingly.
Copyright © 2019 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.
B. Boehm et al. , Value-based software engineering: overview and agenda, in: S. Biffl (Ed.), Value-Based Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidel- berg, Germany, 2005, pp. 3–14 .
Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering, 2nd Addition- Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA ©2002 ISBN: 0201729156
B. W. Boehm, J. R. Brown, M. Lipow , Quantitative Evaluation of Software Quality, , ICSE '76 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Software engineering, Pages 592-605 San Francisco, California, USA-October 13 - 15, 1976 IEEE Computer Society Press Los Alamitos, CA, USA ©1976.
Capers Jones, Applied Software Measurement, Global Analysis of Productivity and Quality, 3rd McGraw-Hill Education Group ©2008 ISBN: 0071502440 9780071502443
Vladimir Mandić, Nebojša Gvozdenović, An extension of the GQM+Strategies approach with formal causal reasoning, Information and Software Technology, Volume 88, 2017, Pages 127-147, ISSN 0950-5849.
Victor Basili, Adam Trendowicz, Martin Kowalczyk _ Jens Heidrich, Carolyn Seaman _ Jürgen Münch, Dieter Rombach,, Aligning Organizations Through Measurement, The Fraunhofer IESE Series on Software and Systems Engineering, ISBN 978-3-319-05046-1 ISBN 978-3-319-05047-8 (eBook), Springer 2014.
R. Kaplan, D. Norton, The strategy map: guide to aligning intangible assets, Strategy Leaders. 5 (32) (2004) 10–17.
Grady, R.B., Practical software metrics for project management and process improvement, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1992.
Vladimir Ivanov, Manuel Mazzara, Witold Pedrycz, Alberto Sillitti, Giancarlo Succi, Assessing the Process of an Eastern European Software, SME using Systemic Analysis, GQM, and Reliability Growth Models-A Case Study, 2016 IEEE/ACM 38th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, ICSE ’16 Companion, May 14-22, 2016, Austin, TX, USA 2016 ACM. ISBN 978-1-4503-4205-6/16/05.
[V. Basili, A. Trendowicz, M. Kowalczyk, J. Heidrich, C. Seaman, J. Münch, D. Rombach, Aligning Organizations Through Measurement, Springer, Switzerland, 2014.
V. Basili, M. Lindvall, M. Regardie, C. Seaman, J. Heidrich, J. Münch, et al., Linking software development and business strategy through measurement, IEEE Comput. 43 (4) (2010) 57–65
V. Basili, D. Weiss , A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 10 (6) (1984) 728–738.
Sarcia S. A. (2010) Is GQM+Strategies really applicable as is to non-software development domains In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy, pp 1–4.
Rini van Solingen and Egon Berghout, The Goal/Question/Metric Method: a practical guide for quality improvement of software development, THE McGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data, Copyright © 1999 McGraw-Hill International (UK) Limited, Printed in Great Britain at the University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 007 709553 7.
Aqeel, Sehrish. (2017). Study on Enhancement on Software Quality by Scheduling Techniques of Real Time Systems European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 2017, 4 (3): 201-208.
Hidenori Nakai, Kiyoshi Honda, Hironori Washizaki, Yoshiaki Fukazawa, Ken Asoh, Kaz Takahashi, Kentarou Ogawa, Maki, Mori, Takashi Hino, Yosuke Hayakawa, Yasuyuki Tanaka, Shinichi Yamada, Daisuke Miyazaki, Continuous Product-Focused Project Monitoring with Trend Patterns and GQM, 2014 21st Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, 1530-1362/14 © 2014 IEEE, Conference Publishing Service.
A. Monden, et al., Customizing GQM Models for Software Project Monitoring, IEICE Trans., Vol. E95-D, No. 9, pp. 2169-2182, 2012.
V.R. Basili, et al., Goal Question Metric Approach, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 528-532, 1994.
Humphrey, W.S., Managing the software process, SEI Series in Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, 1989.
Fenton, N. E., S. L. Pfleeger, Software Metrics, a rigorous and practical approach, Thomson Computer Press, 1996.
Cavano J. P., J.A. McCall, A framework for the measurement of software quality, Proceedings of the software quality and assurance workshop, 1978.
T. Kobori, H. Washizaki, Y. Fukazawa, D. Hirabayashi, K. Shintani, Y. Okazaki, Y. Kikushima, Identifying rationales of strategies by stakeholder relationship analysis to refine and maintain GQM+Strategies models, in: Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, Springer, 2014a, pp. 78–92 .
Software Metrics: A Rigorous & Practical Approach, by Norman E. Fenton and Shari L. Pfleeger, 2nd Edition, PWS Publishing Company, 1997(Chapter 3.2.1-3.2.2).
J. Munch, F. Fagerholm, P. Kettunen, M. Pagels, J. Partanen , Experiences and insights from applying GQM+ Strategies in a systems product development or- ganisation, in: Proceedings of the 2013 39th EUROMICRO Conference on Soft- ware Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), IEEE, 2013, pp. 70–77 .
- There are currently no refbacks.
Please send any question about this web site to email@example.com
Copyright © 2005-2023 Praise Worthy Prize