Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Die Semi Angle Optimization for Cold Drawing of Seamless Tubes Based on Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/ireme.v11i7.13243

Abstract


Cold drawing process is widely applied for seamless tube manufacturing. Die semi angle selection is one of the critical activities during cold drawing of seamless tubes for optimized performance especially in terms of springback and drawing force required. It is a complex problem involving qualitative and quantitative multi-criteria analysis. The purpose of this study is to adopt structured approach to select optimized die semi angle for cold drawing of seamless tubes. The study uses Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based structured approach to select optimum die semi angle by estimating the overall performance score for different values of die semi angles. The outcome of this study suggests that 100 is better die semi angle for both ST 52 tube materiel and AISI D3 die and plug materials. The same results are validated using other optimization techniques and experimentation.
Copyright © 2017 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Analytic Hierarchy Process; Cold Drawing; Die Semi Angle; Drawing Force; Springback

Full Text:

PDF


References


R. V. Rao, Decision making in manufacturing environment using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods (Springer publications, 2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4375-8_1

T. L. Saaty, Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process (Rws Publications, 2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2

T. L. Saaty, An eigenvalue allocation model for prioritization and planning, In Working paper, Energy Management and Policy Center: University of Pennsylvania, 1972.
http://dx.doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-201110

T. L. Saaty, A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of mathematical psychology, Vol.15, n.3, pp. 234-281, 1977.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470011815.b2a4a002

G. Deep, C. Farge, P. Chollet, E. Gervais, Tool angle optimization in rod and tube drawing, Journal of applied metal working, Vol.2, n.4, pp.264-269, 1983.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02833911

S. W. Kim, Y. N. Kwon, Y. S. Lee and J. H. Lee, Design of Mandrel in Tube Drawing Process for Automotive Steering Input Shaft, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.187–188, pp.182–186, 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.134

Xu. Wujiao, K. Wang, P. Wang and J. Zhou, A Newly developed Plug in the Drawing Process for Achieving the High Accuracy of Aluminium Rectangular Tube, Int J Adv. Manuf Technol, Vol.57, pp 1–9, 2011.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3292-8

R. Bihamta, Q. Bui, M. Guillot, G. D’Amours, A. Rahem and M. Fafard, Application of a New Procedure for the Optimization of Variable Thickness Drawing of Aluminium Tubes, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Vol.5, n.2, pp.142-150, 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.03.006

J. Beland, M. Fafard, M. Rahem, G. D’Amours and T. Cote, Optimization on the Cold Drawing Process of 6063 Aluminum Tubes, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol 35, pp.5302–5313, 2011.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.04.025

A. L. R. D. Castro, H. B. Campos and P. R. Cetlin, Influence of die semi-angle on mechanical properties of single and multiple pass drawn copper, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 60, pp.179-182, 1996.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02325-4

D. C. Chen and J. Y. Huan, Design of Brass Alloy Drawing Process using Taguchi Method, Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol.464, pp.135–140, 2007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.139

V. S. Dekhtyarev, Y. Frolov, A. Tereshchenko and A. Golovchenko, Comprehensive Approach to Realizing New Technologies for the Production of High-Precision Cold-Worked Tubes, Metallurgist, Vol. 53, Nos. 3–4, 2009.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11015-009-9147-y

Bayazit, Alexandre da, Silva., Rafael and Menezes Nunes, Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol.16 (7), pp.808-819, 2005.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410380510626204

T. Kaya and C. Kahraman, Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul, Energy, Vol.35, n.6, pp.2517-2527, 2010.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051

N. Hanumaiah, B. Ravi and N. Mukherjee, Rapid hard tooling process selection using QFD-AHP methodology, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol.17(3), pp.332-350, 2006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410380610648290

O. Cakir and M. Canbolat, A web-based decision support system for multi-criteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.35(3), pp.1367-1378, 2008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.041

R. Talebanpour and M. Javadi, Decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems using DEMATEL and SAW, Decision Science Letters, Vol.4(3), pp.363-372, 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2015.4.002

M. Shamsuzzaman, U. Sharif and E. Bohez, Applying linguistic criteria in FMS selection: fuzzy-set-AHP approach, Integrated manufacturing systems, Vol.14, n.3, pp.247-254, 2003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576060310463190

S. Dwivedi, S. Huang, J. Shi and W. Ver Duin, Yield Prediction for Seamless Tubing Processes: a Computational Intelligence Approach, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.37, pp.314–322, 2008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0964-5

G. Bruno, E. Esposito and A. Genovese, A hybrid AHP/FST model for regional aircraft evaluation, In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2013. Sheffield, 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v5i1.181

R. Mohanty and S. Venkataraman, Use of the analytic hierarchy process for selecting automated manufacturing systems, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol.13.n.8, pp.45-57, 1993.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579310039560

C. Yang, S. Chuang and R. Huang, Manufacturing evaluation system based on AHP/ANP approach for wafer fabricating industry, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36, n.8, pp.11369-11377, 2009.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.023

K. Rezaie, S. Shirkouhi and S. Alem, Evaluating and selecting flexible manufacturing systems by integrating data envelopment analysis and analytical hierarchy process model, Third Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation, 2009. AMS'09, IEEE, 2009, pp.460-464.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ams.2009.68

T. Raj, R .Shankar, M. Suhaib, S. Garg and Y. Singh, An AHP approach for the selection of Advanced Manufacturing System: a case study, International Journal of Manufacturing Research, Vol.3,n.4, pp.471-498, 2008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijmr.2008.020905

A. Haddi, A. Imad, and G. Vega, Analysis of temperature and speed effects on the drawing stress for improving the wire drawing process, Materials and Design, Vol.32, n.8, pp.4310-4315, 2011.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.010

Q. Bui, A. Rahem, M. Fafard, R. Bihamta and M. Guillot, Effect of Cross Section Reduction on the Mechanical Properties of Aluminium Tubes Drawn With Variable Wall Thickness, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol.133, n.6, pp.061004, 2011.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4005040

C. Cetinarslan, A study on influences of some process parameters on cold drawing of ferrous wires, Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, Vol.19, n.4, pp.221-228, 2012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.769.221

A. Focellese, F .Gabrielli and R. Ruffin, Application of a decision making method in the forging condition optimization for manufacturing automotive components, Journal of materials processing technology, Vol.60, pp.125-132, 1996.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02317-5

O. Vaidya and S. Kumar, Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications, European Journal of operational research, Vol.169, n.1, pp.1-29, 2006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028

J. Shim, Bibliography research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol.23, pp.161-167, 1989.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(89)90013-x

S. Sipahi and M. Timor, The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications, Management Decision, Vol.48, pp.775-808, 2010.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02517471080000700

F. Zahedi, The analytic hierarchy process: a survey of the method and its applications, Interface, Vol.16, pp.96-108, 1986.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.4.96

S. Wenming and X. Kevin, Themes and Tools of Maritime Transport Research during 2000-2014, Maritime Policy & Management, Vol.44, n.2, pp.151-169, 2017.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2016.1274833

C. Hwang, Y. Lai and T. Liu, Topsis for MODM, European journal of operational research, Vol.76, n.3, pp.486-500, 1994.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8

K. Sawamiphakdi, G. Lahoti and P. Kropp, Simulation of a tube drawing process by the finite element method, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.27, n.1-3, pp.179-190, 1991.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(91)90052-g


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize