Quality of Life (QOL) Assessment: a Case Study of Beijing


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


Quality of life (QOL) is not only a comprehensive description of people's living standards in a society, but also an important indicator of development degree of a society as a whole. This study takes Beijing as a case study from the perspective of individuals’ living, and explores the relationships between social indicators and QOL.
Satisfaction degree is used as a measure of QOL, and was modified by a framework consisting of four dimensions (i.e., quality of physical environment, quality of social environment, quality of economic environment, and quality of transportation) based on peoples’ subjective judgment and the corresponding objective indicator value.
After conducting a hierarchical structure analysis, the result shows that satisfaction degree of social environment is the most significant contributing dimension to QOL, and, income level is the key influential factor for QOL among all the assessment indicators.


Copyright © 2014 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Quality of Life; Social Indicator; Social Assessment Indicator

Full Text:

PDF


References


Robert H.W, What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’, Review of International Political Economy, Vol.10, No.4: 621-644, 2003.

Nemat S, Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol.46 (Special Issue on Environmental Economics): 757-773, October 1994.

Thomas L. S., How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.48, No 1: 9-26, 1990.

Feng Xiaotian, Yi songguo, The quality of life on urban family: indicators and structure, Sociology Research, No.4: 107-118, 2000.

Campbell A., The Quality of American Life (Russell Sage Foundation, 1976).

Hao J. & Wang L., Improving Urban Air Quality in China: Beijing Case Study, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol.55, No. 9: 1298-1305, 2005.

Li F., Wang R., Paulussena J., Liu X., Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China, Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.72, No.4:325-336, 2005.

Bracke P., Measuring the subjective well-being of people in a psychological rehabilitation center and a residential setting: the outline of the study and the measurement properties of a multidimensional indicator of well-being, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3: 222-236, 2001.

Lin Nan, Lu Hanlong, Study for the structure model of social indicators and quality of life, Chinese Social Sciences, No. 4: 75-97, 1989.

Diener E. Suh E. Lucas R. et al., Subject well-being: three decades of progress, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 124, No. 2: 276-302, 1999.

D. Felce, Define and applying the concept of quality of life, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 41, No. 2: 126-135, 1997.

Robert L. Schalock, Quality of life and subjective well-being: conceptual and measurement issues, International Handbook of Research in Intellectual Disabilities (John Willey & Sons, Ltd., 2004).

R. L. Schalock, The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 48 (Issue 3): 203-216, 2004.

M. A. Verdugo, R. L. Schalock, K. D. Keith and R. J. Sthancliffe, Quality of life and its measurement: Important principles and guidelines, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 49 (Issue 10): 707-717, October 2005.

S. Yamazaki, S. Fukuhara, Y. Suzukamo, Household income is strongly associated with health-related quality of life among Japanese men but not women, Public Health, Vol. 119 (Issue 7): 561-567, July 2005.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize