Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A Parametric Cost Model for Estimating Civil Aircraft Line and Base Maintenance


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15866/irease.v12i6.17333

Abstract


The present work proposes a new parametric cost model in order to assess civil aircraft maintenance cost during the initial phase of aircraft design. The model focuses on defined maintenance activities, i.e. line and base maintenance, providing cost estimating relationships for the two cost items under study. The proposed cost model represents an updated alternative tool compared to the state-of-the-art models for civil aircraft maintenance costs estimation. It is based on current aircraft data provided by the International Air Transport Association and it may be useful to assess maintenance cost for new projects during aircraft conceptual design. The collinearity analysis is included in order to select independent cost drivers. The results of the developed model are in good accordance with other reference cost data provided by an independent source. The latter refer to aircraft models not considered in International Air Transport Association reports and adopting new technologies (such as composite structural materials) within their development. The analysis of the results obtained demonstrates that the application of proper corrective coefficients may lead to a maintenance cost estimation model for innovative aircraft configurations based on present architectures.
Copyright © 2019 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


Aircraft Operating Cost; Maintenance Cost; Cost Estimating Relationships; Line Maintenance; Base Maintenance

Full Text:

PDF


References


Fioriti, M., and Chiesa, S., Innovative Solutions for Light, Very Light, and Unmanned Aircraft Preliminary Design and Life Cycle Cost Estimation, LAP Lambert Academic, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2011, pp. 88–144.

Fioriti, M., Boggero, L., Corpino, S., Prakasha, P.S., Ciampa, P.D. and Nagel, B., 2018. The Effect of Sub-systems Design Parameters on Preliminary Aircraft Design in a Multidisciplinary Design Environment. Transportation Research Procedia, 29, pp.135-145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.02.012

Airline Maintenance Cost Executive Commentary, An Exclusive Benchmark Analysis (FY2011 data) by IATA’s Maintenance Cost Task Force, International Air Transport Association, Montreal, March 2013.

FY2013 Maintenance Cost Preliminary Analysis,” [online presentation], International Air Transport Association, Montreal, Sept. 2014.

http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/workgroups/Documents/MCC-2014-ATH/D1/1000-1030-fy13-mtce-cost-analysis-IATA.pdf [retrieved January 2019]

ATA, Standard Method of Estimating Comparative Direct Operating Costs of Turbine Powered Transport Airplanes, Air Transport Association of America, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1967.

Liebeck, R. H., Andrastek, D. A., Chau, J., Girvin, R.,Lyon, R., Rawdon, B. K., Scott, P. W., and Wright, R. A., Advanced Subsonic Airplane Design and Economic Studies, NASA CR-195443, 1995.

AEA,Association of European Airlines: Short-Medium Range Aircraft AEA Requirements, G(T)5656, Brüssel, 1989.

Harris, F. D., An Economic Model of U.S. Airline Operating Expenses, NASA CR-2005-213476, 2005.

Roskam, J., Airplane Design, Part VIII: Airplane Cost Estimation: Design, Development, Manufacturing and Operating, Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corp., Kansas, 1990, pp. 11, 13, 19.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1991-3126

Maddalon, Dal V. Estimating airline operating costs. 1978.

Pearlman, C. H. M., and Simpson, R. W., Maintenance Cost Studies of Present Aircraft Subsystems, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Flight Transportation Lab., Cambridge, MA, 1966.

https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/67987/FTL_R_1966_02.pdf?sequence=1 [retrieved January 2019]

Fioriti, M., Vercella, V.; Viola, N. Cost-Estimating Model for Aircraft Maintenance. Journal of Aircraft, 2017, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c034664

Hess, R., and H. P. Romanoff. Aircraft Airframe Cost Estimating Relationships: All Mission Types. Santa Monica, CA, 1987.

Airbus, Experience and lessons learned of a Composite Aircraft, in 30th ICAS Congress, Daejeon, Korea, 2016.

FY2014 Maintenance Cost Preliminary Analysis,” [online presentation], International Air Transport Association, Montreal, Sept. 2015.

http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/workgroups/Documents/MCC-2015-MIA/D1_1145-1215_-_MCTF_Prelim_Data_Analysis_-_Geraldine_Cros.pdf [retrieved June 2018]

Szabo, S., Liptáková, D., Vajdova, I., Robustness as a Method of Airline Pro-Active Disruption Management, (2015) International Review of Aerospace Engineering (IREASE), 8 (4), pp. 151-156.
https://doi.org/10.15866/irease.v8i4.7545

Santos, L., Melicio, R., Stress, Pressure and Fatigue on Aircraft Maintenance Personal, (2019) International Review of Aerospace Engineering (IREASE), 12 (1), pp. 35-45.
https://doi.org/10.15866/irease.v12i1.14860

Y. Park, M. E. O'Kelly, “Examination of cost-efficient aircraft fleets using empirical operation data in US aviation markets”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 2018, 69, 224-234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.02.002

Parametric Estimating Handbook, 4th ed., International Society of Parametric Analysts, Vienna, VA, April 2008, p. 10, Chap. 3.

Department of Defence (DoD), Parametric Estimating Handbook, 1999.

Y. Qiu, Can the 787 & A350 transform the economics of long-haul services?, Aircraft Commerce, Issue No.39, February/March 2005.

E. S. Arvai, Schonland A.M., Evolutionary Dynamics of the Regional Airline Industry, AirInsight, 2014.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize