CFD Analysis of the Flow Over a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 0009 Airfoil


(*) Corresponding author


Authors' affiliations


DOI's assignment:
the author of the article can submit here a request for assignment of a DOI number to this resource!
Cost of the service: euros 10,00 (for a DOI)

Abstract


The study of flow over an airfoil is crucial in the design of parts in flight applications. The correct shape of airfoils has a large impact on the performance of an aircraft. There are different flow regimes depending on the free stream conditions. The analysis of the two dimensional subsonic flow over a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 0009 airfoil at various air velocities and operating at different angles of attack is presented. The flow was obtained by solving the steady-state governing equations of continuity and momentum conservation combined with the turbulence model [K-ε Realizable] in Fluent 6.3.26 aiming to the validation of these models through the comparison of the predictions and the free field experimental measurements for the selected airfoil. The aim of the work was to show the behavior of the airfoil under these working conditions. The above conditions can be visualized as a section of helicopter rotor along its wing span where the chosen operating conditions validate. The computational domain was composed in a structured way, taking care of the refinement of the grid near the airfoil in order to enclose the boundary layer approach. Calculations were done for variable air velocity altering the air velocities for every turbulence model tested. The k-ε model is one of the most common turbulence models, although it just doesn't perform well in cases of large adverse pressure gradients. It is a two equation model, that means, it includes two extra transport equations to represent the turbulent properties of the flow. These two extra turbulent properties are, the turbulent kinetic energy K and the turbulent dissipation rate ε. The turbulence models used in commercial CFD codes don’t give accurate results for high angle of attacks.
Copyright © 2013 Praise Worthy Prize - All rights reserved.

Keywords


K-ε Model; Turbulent Kinetic Energy; Turbulent Viscosity Ratio, Pressure; Velocity; CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics)

Full Text:

PDF


References


A. Firooz, M. Gadami, (2006), Turbulence Flow for NACA 4412 in Unbounded Flow and Ground Effect with Different Turbulence Models and Two Ground Conditions: Fixed and Moving Ground Conditions, Int. Conference on Boundary and Interior Layers, BAIL 2006. (University of Göttingen, 2006).

Raymond M. Hicks, Garret N. Vanderplaats, Earll M. Murman, Rosa R. King,(1976), Airfoil Section Drag Reduction at Transonic Speeds by Numerical Optimization, SAE Technical Paper 760477, 1976, doi:10.4271/760477.

William G. Bousman, (2002), Airfoil Design and Rotorcraft Performance, Army/NASA Rotorcraft Division Aeroflightdynamics Directorate (AMRDEC) US Army Aviation and Missile Command Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California. Presented at the American Helicopter Society 58th Annual Forum, Montréal, Canada, June 11-13, 2002.

Stephen M. Ruffin and Jae-Doo Lee , Adaptation of a k-ϵ Model to a Cartesian Grid Based Methodology, International journal of mathematical models and methods in applied sciences.

Wojciech Kania, Wieńczysław Stalewski, (2000), Development of new generation main and tail rotors blade airfoils, Institute of Aviation, Warsaw, Poland ICAS 2000 CONGRESS.

McCroskey, W. J.; McAlister, K. W.; Carr, L. W.; Pucci, S. L.; Lambert, O.; Indergrand, R. F,(1981), Dynamic Stall on Advanced Airfoil Sections, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Volume 26, Number 3, 1 July 1981 , pp. 40-50(11).

Ivan Kostic,(2004), Some practical issues in the computational design of airfoils for the helicopter main rotor blades, Theoret. Appl. Mech., Vol.31, No.3-4, pp. 281{315, Belgrade 2004}.

Mark Drela and Michael B. Gilest, (1987), Viscous-Inviscid Analysis of Transonic and Low Reynolds Number Airfoils, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 1987. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts).

Robinson, G.M. and Keane, A.J. (2001), Conciseorthogonal representation of supercritical airfoils, Journal of Aircraft, 38, (3), 580-582.

Christian Bak, Peter Fuglsang, Jeppe Johansen, Ioannis Antoniou, (2000), Wind Tunnel Tests of the NACA 63-415 and a Modified NACA 63-415 Airfoil, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark December 2000.

Myose, R., Heron, I., and Papadakis, (1996) M., The Post-Stall Effect of Gurney Flaps on a NACA-0011 Airfoil, SAE Technical Paper 961316, 1996, doi:10.4271/961316.

F.B Gustafson worked (1949),The application of airfoil studies to helicopter rotor design. Book contributor- NASA.

Richard L. Fearn, Airfoil Aerodynamics Using Panel Methods, The Mathematica Journal 10:4 2008 Wolfram Media, Inc.

K. M. Pandey, N. K. Saha, E. Ahmed, 3D CFD Analysis of Helicopter Rotor at Higher Rotational Speed, (2012) International Review of Aerospace engineering (IREASE), 5 (2), pp. 54-61.

Nicholas K. Borer, Design and Analysis of Low Reynolds Number Airfoils, Final Project MATH 6514: Industrial Math Submitted to Dr. J. McCuan, 4 December 2002.

W.L. Siauw, J.-P. Bonnet, J. Tensi, L. Cordier, B.R. Noacka, L. Cattafesta, Transient dynamics of the flow around a NACA 0015 airfoil using fluidic vortex generators, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 31 (2010) 450–459.

Douvi C. Eleni, Tsavalos I. Athanasios and Margaris P. Dionissios, Evaluation of the turbulence models for the simulation of the flow over a National Advisory Committee forAeronautics (NACA) 0012 airfoil, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research Vol. 4(3), pp. 100-111, March 2012.

Olivier Marsden, Christophe Bogey, Christophe Bailly, Large Eddy Simulation of the flow around a NACA 0012 airfoil at a Reynolds number of 500,000.

Dr Con Doolan, Numerical Simulation of a Blunt Airfoil Wake using a Two-Dimensional URANS Approach, School of Mechanical Engineering The University of Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, March, 2007.

Saliveros, Efstratios (1988), Aerodynamic performance of the NACA-4415 aerofoil section at low Reynolds numbers. MSc(R) thesis, University of Glasgow.

K. M. Pandey, Gaurav Kumar, AnandSurana, Dhrubajyoti Deka CFD Analysis of Airbus A380 Isolated Wings during Take-Off, Cruising and Landing and Comparison with Low Reynolds Number, High Lift S1223 Airfoil, (2012) International review of aerospace engineering (IREASE), 5 (3), pp. 80-88.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Please send any question about this web site to info@praiseworthyprize.com
Copyright © 2005-2024 Praise Worthy Prize